RSS
Twitter
Insiders Set To File Whistle Blower Lawsuits Against E-Voting Firms?
from the this-could-get-interesting... dept
There's not much to go on yet, but John has submitted this story, claiming that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (who recently wrote an article for Rolling Stone about voting problems in Ohio) is getting set to file whistleblower lawsuits against two voting machine firms, with insider testimony. Supposedly, that insider testimony will include details of how those companies misrepresented the accuracy, reliability and security of the various voting machines. Of course, none of this should come as a surprise to anyone who's followed the actions of voting machine companies in the past. It's well known that the voting machines have security flaws -- it's been shown time and time again. Yet, every time it comes up, the voting machine companies dismiss the issues as minor (sometimes with jokes) -- even when the evidence suggests the problems are quite serious. Past revelations from insiders at Diebold revealed how they knowingly used uncertified software in elections and how, if they were forced to provide a paper trail, they might as well charge extortionate prices to do so. Should be interesting to see what the latest reports from insiders will turn up.
Reader Comments
(Flattened / Threaded)
What ever happened to punch cards?
Back in the olden days, computers worked with punch cards. Why, oh why, can't someone like IBM come up with a machine that creates a paper punch card when you vote; drop the card in the reader and *bingo* you've voted AND you've left a paper trail. Although it once was, it's no longer rocket science ... sheesh.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
You must be kidding...
Do the words, "hanging chad" mean anything to you?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: You must be kidding...
The hanging chads and such were the result of trying to do things cheaply: they tried to use perforated cards and inexpensive styluses instead of the much more expensive card punching machines. I would guess that computer type card punchers, while reliable, are probably way too expensive to deploy.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: You must be kidding...
Well, maybe Walmart should start selling machines made in China......
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: You must be kidding...
when the govt. can give totals of billions of dollars to other countries in aid, you'd think we'd be able to plunk down a little coin to get our own shit fixed, first.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: You must be kidding...
Yes.... "Hanging chad" means there is something there that a person can look at, and say "this might be a problem". Which is a heck of a lot better than the new Diebold machines that have no such indicator of problems or of intentional wrong-doing, and which cannot be recounted by hand if people suspect the machines of having an error.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
At least someone in congress realized these things are a huge problem, just waiting to happen
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Open source voting machine
I'll even write the first line of code.
main(){}
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Concerned
I'm all about the modernization and computerization of things... but something that can so easily be manipulated, i.e. computer programs, logs etc..., should not be allowed in the voting process. Political parties are the most corrupt groups of individuals this planet has ever known. Party affiliated people are as hardcore as religious fundamentalists. Why, oh why are we letting something as easily manipulated as computer systems into the voting process? Hell, doing it the old fashioned way still had its problems but they, by far, have such a smaller potential for manipulation compared to computerized forms of voting.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Security
Security??? How secure was the old system? At least the new system takes a monkey called baxter to break into! I promise I will bring OHIO home for GW!!!! GW for KING!!!!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Security
The old system wasn't overly secure, but I repeat the potential for manipulation in a computerized system is far greater.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Security
I'm not buying this BS. I think this talk is generated by the Liberal Press seeking a story. A story where they do not have to have evidence or perform research in order to support their story.
Explain to me how such an orchestrated attack or fraud would take place? I'm sure you have thought this through.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
RFKjr and those insiders better be very careful. Diebold et al are capable of shit that would make a Grisham novel look a Mother Goose bedtime story...
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
TRUST ME!!!
Trust me, the people that work at Diebold Election Systems are not smart enough to be so calculated. Why do you think I sold my stake in the company? Also, the States have process in place to prevent such fraud. The States perform System Testing on each version of software and in some case put Tamper tape on the Machine to prevent mis use. Trust me, that taper tape is the ticket!!!!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
RE: Pat
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20040816/dugger/7
That's how Pat.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: RE: Pat
I liked the article, especially the following statement:
"We had 22,000 voting stations. How would you like to be in charge of 22,000 passwords?"
Gee, how many would he like? Keeping track of them? How about a database? Diebold could do so many things better for security.
Thanks for the link.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Re: Security
ahahaha... I knew someone would try to make this a party issue... Pat, get your head out of your ass. If the systems are networked in any way to, say, a business network or any kind of network that has wan access a worm can definetly find its way in. If it happened at nuclear power plant http://www.securityfocus.com/news/6767
then it could definetly happen on these systems.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment