Computers

Computers

by Mike Masnick


Print



FBI Gets Back Veterans Data Laptop; Claims No One Accessed It

from the all-clear? dept

After all of the coverage concerning the laptop and hard drive stolen from a Veterans Affairs employee's home, the FBI is now claiming that it has recovered the system, and based on their checks, it appears that the data was never accessed. All along, many people figured this was the work of a random burglar who had no clue what was on the laptop -- and this recovery suggests that may have been correct. However, the FBI admits that no one is in custody, after an anonymous person they don't believe was involved turned in the machine. Of course, rather than taking the FBI's word for it, I'd imagine most people whose data is in the database would feel better with some credit monitoring.

19 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. Lets get real

    by WhosYourDaddy - Jun 29th, 2006 @ 12:58pm

    Now these guys are getting a little EMO over this dont ya think? Maybe they need some of this

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  2. Oh There it is!

    by LostAndFound - Jun 29th, 2006 @ 1:38pm

    I bet it was just misplaced and then they found it hiding behind someones desk. DOH!!

    *waiting for the truth to come out*

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  3. No mention of the CDs?

    by Nova Lounge - Jun 29th, 2006 @ 1:49pm

    Just an observation - much of the orignal coverage about the theft also said that there were data CDs which contained the master data being used on the notebook. No mention of recovery there. And of course, since cds are read-only, there's way to tell if they'd been accessed... if they were recovered. (shrug). As a vet, I'm not feeling any better about this.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  4. by JerseyRich - Jun 29th, 2006 @ 1:51pm

    They may very well be right. I found a digital camera once that contained loads of pics. All I did was delete the pics and start taking my own.

    I'd feel better with some credit monitoring though.

    Anyway, how dare anyone question the truthfulness/accuracy of the FBI???? LMAO

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  5. trade you for an eighth dude...

    by Jeff - Jun 29th, 2006 @ 1:57pm

    The laptop was prolly traded for some weed and the guy who had it, forgot he had it. It took the FBI a few weeks to identify what happened and a few hours to beat the supplier's address out of little Johnny.

    Or maybe bad guys took it and realized that Vets are all underpaid low wage earning Americans that have crappy credit. :(

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  6. by our gov sucks - Jun 29th, 2006 @ 2:10pm

    So they recovered the laptop and hard drive, but now admit to records missing since 05 and a data tape missing since may of this year. And on top of it there is evidence the employee who "lost" the laptop had permission to take home all of this information.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  7. Re: trade you for an eighth dude...

    by drkkgt - Jun 29th, 2006 @ 2:11pm

    ...and have access to heavy munitions

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  8. YEAH RIGHT

    by ANON - Jun 29th, 2006 @ 2:14pm

    Us in the computer industry know ways of copying data off of hard drives without modifiying them...

    take drive out, put in any forensic tool (like the FBI is doing) and read away... no foot print.

    therefore even if analysis shows it wasn't accessed it still might have been......

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  9. Re: YEAH RIGHT

    by Adam - Jun 29th, 2006 @ 2:25pm

    There's a problem with that. If we start assuming that that's what happened, then we have to assume that whoever stole it in the first place knew what they had. And then the government might be liable for something. This way is much better: the government can start spending money protecting us, thus generating good will before all those projects get quietly shut down; the vets can feel a little better that they really dodged a bullet there, and might not waste some of the little time they have left (in some cases) keeping track of their credit; and the thieves get to have a shopping spree. Everybody wins.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  10. by randolei4.7128346135479613985469187357923465792634 - Jun 29th, 2006 @ 3:12pm

    agree with anon. its not that hard.
    ^ ^
    +
    __/

    (hmm interesting thing)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  11. Re: YEAH RIGHT

    by dudhaaaa - Jun 29th, 2006 @ 3:14pm

    "...copying data off of hard drives without modifiying them" - Helix, FTX, Sleuthkit, EnCase(if you got $$$), etc. Hopefully, this was done by some DumbA*s or DumbA*s's and not someone who has a clue; but, if I was one of those names on the drive, I'd definitly sign up for some credit reporting!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  12. easy copying

    by R Ahrens - Jun 30th, 2006 @ 5:44am

    Yeah, an unencrypted HD is easy to copy - all ya need is a copy of ghost. In less than an hour, you've got it all. restore it to another HD, and you can access it all you want, and the original is essentially untouched.

    That said, being one of those vets, I definately want the gov't to step up here and help us get free credit reports (one per month would be nice) to just be sure.

    Of course, they could be right and it was just some stupid punk looking for drug money - but they don't know who he sold it to, do they...

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  13. by Anonymous Coward - Jun 30th, 2006 @ 8:05am

    For all the vets whining about credit reports being supplied, thats all BS, Gimme gimme gimme....

    Simply call the three major reporting agencies, or write them. Explain you are a vet and your data may have been compromised and request a fraud alert be placed on your account. They all send you a report for review, and your account is essentially frozen for a period of time. You stop getting all those pesky credit card offers for that period also!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  14. by Anonymous Coward - Jun 30th, 2006 @ 9:23am

    Notice that the article say that the FBI plans "more tests". Why? If they can truely tell that that the data has not been accesed, than there should be no need for "more tests". The fact is, is probably impossible to tell if the data was accessed. Since when did the FBI get into the business of helping to cover up crime?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  15. by Anonymous Coward - Jun 30th, 2006 @ 10:01am

    "Since when did the FBI get into the business of helping to cover up crime?"

    From the start... How they help depends on who you are.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  16. by Anonymous Coward - Jun 30th, 2006 @ 1:31pm

    OK, so no one wants to believe that some stupid crook stole a laptop, and then realized from the media what he actually had and who was looking for it?

    Sounds like Robert Redford in the Sting, pulled a con on a mob numbers runner and then his partner gets wacked.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  17. Re: YEAH RIGHT

    by Brian - Jul 1st, 2006 @ 1:05am

    Hell, just boot using a LiveCD and send the data out the network port. Even if it were formatted in NTFS, if you know what you are doing you can mount it as RO (Read-Only) and never leave a trace on the HD. You don't always have to use tools such as Encase or remove the drive from the PC/Laptop to do a forensic copy/analysis. All it takes is a little thought and the right toolset.

    Despite the FBI assertions this does not give me any warm fuzzies. I'm still waiting for that damn letter on how to activate credit monitoring.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  18. by ted - Nov 21st, 2006 @ 12:40pm

    you suck

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  19. emos

    by jasmine - May 19th, 2007 @ 5:46pm

    ur sad as im an emo so dn't make fun of them or u will die cock sucer

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..
Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It