Overhype

Overhype

by Mike Masnick




Why Don't We Call Them ADDvertisements?

from the short-attention-span-advertisements dept

It's no secret that the days of the "30-second spot" are increasingly a thing of the past. Plenty of advertisers have tried to figure out ways around it from product placement to actually making commercials worth paying attention to. It appears Clear Channel is now trying its own experiment. Figuring that the 30 second radio spot is simply too long in this attention deficient world, they want to try offering one-second spots (found via Threadwatch). Yes, one second spots. Just long enough for... well, no, actually not long enough for anything, other than maybe to get some attention for doing something pointless.

23 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    Jun 14th, 2006 @ 2:14pm
  • by Git R Done...

    3 or 4 1 second commercials then 40 minutes of good tunes.

    That will work!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jun 14th, 2006 @ 2:29pm
  • Bigger is not always better

    by Me

    Personally, I think the little blib stating "This program was made possible by..." Or "This program was sponsored by..." gives the company a much more positive image than if they were to have a 15-30 second ad during that same broadcast.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Jun 16th, 2006 @ 8:37am
    • Re: Bigger is not always better

      by Limerat

      i agree.
      Last night I was watching Discovery and I was first told "This program is brought to you by.."
      This was followed by nine commercials...
      Do they really think we are going to pay attention to that many commercials and to remember the content of each and be impressed enough to buy the product?
      i don't think so.
      Most ads are so stupid,irritating and obnoxious I simply hit mute and find something else to do.

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    Jun 14th, 2006 @ 2:38pm
  • Juuuust long enough...

    by Dosquatch

    For Gilbert Gottfried to pop on and scream, "BUY A FORD!"

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jun 14th, 2006 @ 2:41pm
  • be afraid....

    by Tyshaun

    What's next, the 1 millisecond commercial. Actually, I wonder if they've played around with subliminal tracks underneath the music. Might make some of the "performers" sound better!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jun 14th, 2006 @ 2:42pm
  • Sometimes the most effective commercials...

    Sometimes the most effective commercials, at least to me, are actually accidents. You know how sometimes on TV there will be overlap and you will see one commercial for only a fraction of a second or a second? That quick flash is sometimes more effective as it actually makes me think a bit about the product. It's weird but true!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jun 14th, 2006 @ 2:42pm
  • and that's how many superbowl ads???

    I just could not help but wonder how many superbowl ads clearchannel might be able to squish in... :)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jun 14th, 2006 @ 2:43pm
  • Advertisers are Stupid

    by wolff000

    Well not really, but they don't seem to be too bright these days. Why not just cut commercials to say 5 seconds long enough for the name of the company and whatever inane slogan they have. It would be much more enjoyable than 2 or 3 30 second ones in a row. Just my 2 cents.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jun 14th, 2006 @ 2:44pm
  • by operator

    i think i can yell "cheese" in one second.

    do i get a cookie?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jun 14th, 2006 @ 2:56pm
  • by Valhalla Rising

    Imagine how confusing it would be for 5-6 1 second commercials back to back. you cant even fot half the manes into a second. Try outback steakhouse for one. Litrtle 5-10 second blips maybe you might get something across.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jun 14th, 2006 @ 3:00pm
  • by Jeff R

    Blipverts made real. Life does imitate Art.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jun 14th, 2006 @ 3:25pm
  • The Future Is Now

    by J.R.

    One second spots? it hink it'll wind up where companies pay 3 times as much for three seconds of spot time all put together.

    "We have enough for approximately three words."
    "Hmm... I've got it! BUY A FORD!"
    "Two point oh one seconds. We could squish another word in there."
    "BUY A FORD NOW!"
    "Perfect."

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jun 14th, 2006 @ 3:26pm
  • by J.R.

    Also, I predict the Micro Machine Man will have his day again.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jun 14th, 2006 @ 4:00pm
  • by Panic

    micro machine man...I miss that guy

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jun 14th, 2006 @ 4:22pm
  • It's the milliondollarhomepage of audio.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jun 14th, 2006 @ 5:12pm
  • by Anonymous Coward

    I thought Clear Channel was one of the media conglomorates that knew how to run a business until I saw this... Retards.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jun 15th, 2006 @ 6:39am
  • Patently stupid

    by Jeff

    Hmm. How long will it be before one advertising company starts suing another one for violating their copyrighted 1-second ad campaign?

    What portion of a 1-second ad campaign would be considered "fair use" in another ad campaign or other medium?

    How long would it take to sue the bajeebus off a kid who took a bunch of 1-second ad campaigns and used them as "samples" in his new R&B song? I'm assuming the kid's MySpace video of the song would also include a montage of split-second video images collected from ad campaigns as well.

    EVERYBODYCO. V. JOHNNY LITTLE JR.

    Comes now the plaintiff, EVERYBODYCO., hereafter referred to as EVERYBODY, bearing complaint against JOHNNY LITTLE JR. hereafter referred to as JOHNNY. EVERYBODY alleges JOHNNY did violate EVERYBODY's copyrights by including an audio sample of a half-second scream dubbed over a half-second piano chord, which is copyrighted by EVERYBODY as The Everybody Sound. Further, in the duration of JOHNNY's song, EVERYBODY alleges that The Everybody Sound was repeated no less than 200 times. EVERYBODY also alleges that JOHNNY's song was made available to approximately 2 billion people on the Internet. EVERYBODY has licensed The Everybody Sound to film studios at a rate of $1 per incident. Therefore EVERYBODY humbly asks the court that JOHNNY immediately surrender $400 billion in licensing fees to EVERYBODY for his usage of The Everybody Sound, plus punitive damages, damages for EVERYBODY's emotional suffering and distress as well as legal fees and court costs.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jun 15th, 2006 @ 10:15am
  • Cool Lets see those

    by ntlgnce

    I really want to the one second ads come to the internet. Then we wouldent have to wait so long while we waited to play free games.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Oct 6th, 2006 @ 12:25am
  • job

    by jojo

    I just want a job avertiseing yahoo on my car.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It