Internet Continues To Break Down Local Protectionist Laws
from the license-for-what-now? dept
Over the past few years, it's been clear that services provided over the internet have been putting a lot of pressure on local businesses who often hide behind local protectionist laws. Luckily, many have started to realize that such protectionist laws don't do much good for consumers. Court rulings have tackled local protectionist laws on things like wine and contact lenses, but there are other issues starting to show up lately as well. For example, eBay has been going around fighting laws that could require local eBay users to get an auctioneer's license. Now there's another example, with an online home-buying site suing the state of New Hampshire over whether or not it needs to become a registered broker in the state. Of course, the state hasn't acted against the site yet, so it may just be something of a publicity stunt. However, it does highlight some of the issues with many of these local licensing laws that are much more about keeping out competitors rather than consumer safety.
16 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Schrödinger's Download: Whether Or Not An iTunes Music Sale Is A 'Sale' Depends On Who's Suing
- We Don't Have A 'Wild West' Internet Now, But We Will If SOPA Or Similar Is Passed
- One Nation, Under Guard
- Supreme Court Denies Appeal For The Pirate Bay Founders
- White House Says It Can't Comment On Possible Chris Dodd Investigation





Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Used contact lenses anyone?
What is to prevent unethical "real estate" sites based in Russia from selling beachfront property in Arizona? How about sites that sell toxic wine full of pollutants, sold as "20-year-old Bordeaux"? How about stolen property from country A being sold in country B, via 3rd-party country C that makes it impossible to prosecute?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Used contact lenses anyone?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
(in response to the license-for-what-now tagline)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Used contact lenses anyone?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Used contact lenses anyone?
Most people know of unethical behavior by licensed real estate brokers. I can think of two, first-hand examples.
As with any transaction, you need to know who you're buying from.
Martha Stewart had been a licensed stock broker, but she went ahead with the trades.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Used contact lenses anyone?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Used contact lenses anyone?
Those horrible jerks, giving consumers what they really want!!! Why I oughta...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
This idiot would fail
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Unlicensed Surgeons anyone?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
license?
but if something isn't certified in your country for the usage you put it to, there should *not* be the oppertunity to seek legal redress over this, you bought it, the responsibility is *yours* to make sure its suitable.
if its sold in a shop then its the shops job, since *they* imported it. import it yourself and thats on you.
and as for 'services' like music download sites, regulation is pointless anyway since they is no physical product to track, just bits & bytes.
if you choose to buy surgery online, and travel to another country for it, *without* a few basic checks, well you get what you pay for.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Used contact lenses anyone?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment