(Mis)Uses of Technology

(Mis)Uses of Technology

by Joseph Weisenthal




Just To Be Safe, UK Government To Confiscate Cryptographic Keys

from the trust-us,-well-keep-it-secure dept

As new UK regulations come into force, businesses may be compelled to hand over cryptographic keys to the police force. The explanation, surprisingly enough, is that the government needs the keys in order to effectively combat pedophiles, terrorists, and any other public menace that a politician can dream up. Defenders of the actions say there is a difference between handing over the keys and being required to decrypt private data, but it's not clear why the key can't be handed over after the police suspect illicit communication. Besides, a centralized collection of cryptographic keys would be quite the mother lode for cyber-criminals to attack. Even if they're impenetrable from the outside, they'll be hard to protect from an internal attack (e.g. a spy). Should the regulations be executed, the big loser could be the UK, as companies keep important information and keys outside of its borders. As hard as it is to imagine, it seems a regulation designed to keep people safer from predators might actually heighten their risk.

20 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. May 18th, 2006 @ 1:40pm

    wow

    by hobot

    wow
    wow
    wow

    This is fucking terrible.
    WHO THE FUCK THOUGHT THIS UP, THIS IS THE WORST IDEA I HAVE EVER HEARD.
    DUR DUR DUR UD RU.

    Jesus fuckign christ on a cracker.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  2. May 18th, 2006 @ 3:13pm
    by Anonymous Coward

    -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
    Version: PGP Desktop 9.0.6 (Build 6060)

    qANQR1DDDQQJAwIOdpcZlLBRJ2DSWQE/hp3MzzU1KGi+94MU9vUVM2mKifsATh01
    HvnvCNfHhiDgX3n92C1TJN83C U3v5V+e021QCZqsQaeXacqnJ/wRKmpLaiC41Bbo
    lgxG3K2c9VIwzsDx7e2B
    =hKZB
    -----END PGP MESSAGE-----

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  3. May 18th, 2006 @ 3:15pm

    Re:

    by Anonymous Coward

    HOW DO I READ UR MESSAGE ??

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  4. May 18th, 2006 @ 3:19pm

    Re: Re:

    by Anonymous Coward

    never

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  5. May 18th, 2006 @ 3:53pm

    Faulted reasoning

    by I, for one

    This says some important things.

    Firstly it an admission that GCHQ/MI5 etc lack the computer capabilities and/or resources to crack everyday crypotgraphy. That means that PGP etc really is pretty good.

    Secondly it is, on the face of it quite sensible. It places the responsibility for data with the data owner. Many companies simply can't manage their internal security (hell some can't even manage basic website security) so they place their keys in escrow. The law is designed to pave the way for forcing the accused to get those keys back not tie up police time and resources chasing rainbows.

    The requirement is not an a priori arrangement as many people will assume. You don't have to hand over keys for all and any encrypted data you have. It is a measure to be used when a crime is under investigation not an open door to give the police unfettered access to company and private data.

    But, it falls down on two points.

    It creates a crime of not handing over the keys. There are many legitimate reasons to not have keys. Any good security policy rotates keys on a weekly or daily basis for non retained info. And why would you keep old keys, especially if you are up to no good? Thus it makes no distinction between well intentioned good security policy and suspicious behaviour.

    It's based on the investigators assumption. There is no distinction between random noise and encrypted data. If the police come across a block of noise from a random wipe how are they to identify it? They ask the user for the key, and of course there is none, but then a criminal would say that wouldn't they. Thus, again, there is no technical way to differentiate between illegal and legal activity. One is therefore guilty of a crime (refusing to hand over non-existant keys) purely on the basis of an arbitary accusation.

    In summary it has the usual effect of making those who are truly criminal but well informed safer (they will rotate and destroy keys for nefarious reasons) while exposing the innocent to greater chance of injustice and abuse.

    Now I'll tell you, I know a few good cops. They hate this crap. They are overwhelmed, lacking in expertise and resources and completely befuddled by the technicalities and the laws. Most (all normal police but a few uber geek detectives) want to abandon what they see as a huge waste of time chasing technological evidence and go back to old fashioned methods of psychology and human investigation. That's how you catch criminals.

    Which is why this law was obviously not created by the needs of criminal investigation. It is an admission by government that they powerless against criminals who use sophisticated methods and an attempt to change the burden of proof. They need to acknowledge that they have lost this battle and shift resources back into manpower where it can be effective (observation, infiltration, case building).

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  6. May 18th, 2006 @ 5:14pm

    Citizens of the UK

    by Colin LeMahieu

    People living in the UK need to put their government on a leash. Far too long have they allowed their government to get out of control with their policing policies.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  7. May 18th, 2006 @ 5:26pm

    Re: Citizens of the UK

    by |333173|3|_||3

    But all the leader of major parties are Scots, and they have different laws anyway, so what chance do everyone else have. All they do is pass one set of laws in Scotland and a different set in Westminster, just like with university fees. the public won't act because too many ppl are ignorant sheep, just like in the USA or Aus.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  8. May 18th, 2006 @ 5:58pm
    by Anonymous Coward

    Mein Fuehrer in London, we in the EU and US will follow you in the interest of harmonisation.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  9. May 18th, 2006 @ 6:07pm

    This Doesn't Seem Plausible

    I mean, it's certainly plausible that government officials will be this stupid.

    However, I don't understand why governments go to such lengths to punish the law abiding while those breaking the laws will just continue to ignore the new rules as well. Idiots!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  10. May 18th, 2006 @ 9:27pm
    by Anonymous Coward

    given how laws in one country often turn up in another, I suspect it's only a matter of time before similiar legislation turns on in the US. Given the amount of stories I've read about government compromised systems, or occasionally sheer incompetence, I don't have to worry about terrorist and theives. The government is doing most of their legwork for them.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  11. May 18th, 2006 @ 10:49pm
    by Anonymous Coward

    Nothing we can do except sit back and watch the world destroy itself.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  12. May 19th, 2006 @ 3:54am
    by Louis

    Totally insane.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  13. May 19th, 2006 @ 4:22am

    Why do you think AOL paid billions for Skype?

    by Skype

    AOL recieved funding from the US Gov to purchase Skype to get access all all the encryption keys. Now the NSA can eavesdrop on all your skype calls too.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  14. May 19th, 2006 @ 4:48am
    by Anonymous Coward

    ANOTHER BRILLIANT IDEA FROM THE SAME MORONS WHO CONFISCATED MOST FIREARMS NOT IN CRIMINAL HANDS. i DIDN'T NOTE TOO MUCH WHINING THEN. YOUR OX JUST GOT GORED, HOPE YOU ENJOY IT.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  15. May 19th, 2006 @ 6:35am

    Stupid and stupid

    First, the idea is stupid because only people with nothing to hide are going to give up their keys. Everyone else isn't. So you're going to have access to the information you don't need. The poster above pretty much outlined all the reasons this is ridiculous.

    Also stupid, however, is number 14. Hey dipshit...they never had guns. The laws preventing your average everyday citizen and/or criminal from getting guns came early...before guns were really common. Thus...NO ONE got guns, and they still don't have them. Criminals or "good guys" alike.

    This obviously won't work in the US because we all already have guns, so only the law abiding citizens would be likely to give them up. Which would be kinda dumb. In fact, its almost the same thing as the crypt keys.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  16. May 19th, 2006 @ 9:37am

    Re: Stupid and stupid

    by Anonymous Coward

    what planet are you from. crooks buy new guns all the time. its not a matter of it being impossible to get people to give up their guns--its a matter of it being impossible to get people to quit buying them. or quit selling them.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  17. Jul 28th, 2006 @ 6:57am

    Re: Faulted reasoning

    by Dee

    Well said

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  18. Jul 28th, 2006 @ 7:00am
    by Dee

    (__/) (='.'=)This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny (")_(")into your signature to help him gain world domination. :D ._...|..____________________, , ....../ `---___________----_____|] = = = D ...../_==o;;;;;;;;_______.:/ .....), ---.(_(__) / ....// (..) ), ----" ...//___// ..//___// .//___// ................ __ ...........__.(__)..__ ..........(__)l.....l(__) ..........l.=.ll..=.ll.=.l.__ ..........l... .ll.....ll....l(__) ..........l.=.ll==ll.=.ll.=.l ..........l....ll.....ll....ll....l __.......l. =.ll==ll.=.ll.=.l l]...)....l......................l l....|....l......................l (......_. /......................l ................................l ...............................l ..... ........................./ ..._......................./ ...l.....................l

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  19. Jul 28th, 2006 @ 7:01am
    by Dee

    (__/)
    (='.'=)This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny
    (")_(")into your signature to help him gain world domination. :D


    ._...|..____________________, ,
    ....../ `---___________----_____|] = = = D
    ...../_==o;;;;;;;;_______.:/
    .....), ---.(_(__) /
    ....// (..) ), ----"
    ...//___//
    ..//___//
    .//___//


    ................ __
    ...........__.(__)..__
    ..........(__)l.....l(__)
    ..........l.=.ll..=.ll.=.l.__
    ..........l... .ll.....ll....l(__)
    ..........l.=.ll==ll.=.ll.=.l
    ..........l....ll.....ll....ll....l
    __.......l. =.ll==ll.=.ll.=.l
    l]...)....l......................l
    l....|....l......................l
    (......_. /......................l
    ................................l
    ...............................l
    ..... ........................./
    ..._......................./
    ...l.....................l

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  20. Jul 28th, 2006 @ 7:01am
    by Dee

    (__/)
    (='.'=)This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny
    (")_(")into your signature to help him gain world domination. :D


    ._...|..____________________, ,
    ....../ `---___________----_____|] = = = D
    ...../_==o;;;;;;;;_______.:/
    .....), ---.(_(__) /
    ....// (..) ), ----"
    ...//___//
    ..//___//
    .//___//


    ................ __
    ...........__.(__)..__
    ..........(__)l.....l(__)
    ..........l.=.ll..=.ll.=.l.__
    ..........l... .ll.....ll....l(__)
    ..........l.=.ll==ll.=.ll.=.l
    ..........l....ll.....ll....ll....l
    __.......l. =.ll==ll.=.ll.=.l
    l]...)....l......................l
    l....|....l......................l
    (......_. /......................l
    ................................l
    ...............................l
    ..... ........................./
    ..._......................./
    ...l.....................l

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It