Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   Reasonable expectations

   

   Bob, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 3:28pm

   
   

   I don't believe such a suit, if ever filed, would see the light of day. If a company has any spam filters in place and operating, I would suggest that they are making a resonable effort to keep spam from from your inbox. All spam is spam. Porn spam. Financial scam spam. Cheap prescription medecine spam. To differentiate serves no purpose. All spam clogs the network and consumes drive space regardless of it's type. The employer is not required to filter your company mail account. Nor is your employer required to provide you wih a company mail account. If I were an employer and someone tried to sue me for sexual harrasment due to porn spam, they better make sure that when I review their mail history, I don't find any outgoing mail that does not pertain to company business... Because most streets go both ways.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   If you are getting porn spam...

   

   BMR777, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 3:35pm

   
   

   If you are getting porn spam on a corporate email account I would recommend looking at where that employee is using the corporate email address. Corporate email addresses should be used with business contacts only, employees should have a seperate personal email where they can sign up for junk and such.
   
   BMR777

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3.  

   Re: Reasonable expectations

   

   DittoBox, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 3:36pm

   
   

   Mod parent up! +1 Insightful...
   
   Oh wait...wrong site!

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4.  

   Re: Reasonable expectations

   

   Andrew Fife, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 3:38pm

   
   

   "All spam is spam. Porn spam. Financial scam spam. Cheap prescription medecine spam. To differentiate serves no purpose."
   
   My take is that legally there is a difference. Getting offers for cheap interest rates may be bothersome but it is not offensive in the same way that pornography is to some people.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

5.  

   I'd say its legitimate

   

   Benjamin, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 3:44pm

   
   

   I think that this is insightful and is definetely something that could be addressed. Perhaps you could sue for anythign these days... Could you win against a big corporation though? Unlikely

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

6.  

   Re: If you are getting porn spam...

   

   Nismoto, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 5:04pm

   
   

   If only it were that simple. There are numerous ways a person's email address can end up on a distibution list, not just because the person used their email address inappropriately.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

7.  

   

   Anonymous Coward, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 5:04pm

   
   

   wether or not the spam is offensive or not is not the question.. different people find different things offensive.. but to many courts they do use the community rule to whats offensive.. and since the internet is on a global scale.. for the courts to even rule on something like this is ridiculous.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

8.  

   Spam

   

   AnarChaos, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 5:18pm

   
   

   I guess this depends on the company's surfing and Email policies as well - obvious (or hopefully) no employee is surfing pr0n while @ the office or even registering on the sites. Besides - is this bulk unsolicited Email going to all business Email accounts or just one individual in the office?? (_/) (0.o) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain World Domination.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

9.  

   Pie or Spam?

   

   FunnyMan, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 5:21pm

   
   

   I like pie, and cheese...
   
   That was spam, but it wasn't offensive now was it? So you see there is a difference, however unless the employee wishes someone to read their every mail before it is opened like some kind of prison, then I dont think the company is liable...

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

10.  

    

    Anonymous Coward, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 5:49pm

    
    

    Hitler handled this problem the same way that local schools are handling it today - they require all persons to wear uniforms.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

11.  

    well

    

    Tim Howard, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 5:58pm

    
    

    from what i know my dad gets about 400 spam emails a day, no one knows why, and hes blocked so many of them that microsoft outlook cant even check all the emails as they come in thus i believe it depends on the person more then them not being able to block the porn spam

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

12.  

    Re: If you are getting porn spam...

    

    Anonymous Coward, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 6:14pm

    
    

    Unless ofcource there just sending the spam to every name combination at the domain for the company.
    [email protected]
    [email protected]
    ECT...

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

13.  

    Damn hell Mike... dont be giving em ideas!

    

    Anonymous Coward, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 6:26pm

    
    

    Damn hell Mike... dont be giving em ideas! Now the next 4 months of Techdirt, Slashdot, and every other tech news site out there will be reporting on the thousands of people sueing their employers with the excuse that their employer didnt block porn-spam!

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

14.  

    porn spam

    

    anon, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 6:50pm

    
    

    I worked at a company that had every capability of blocking porn spam. However, numerous porn messages reached me on a daily basis. After some time it became clear to me that none of my mail colleagues were finding porn messages in their inbox. This I think was indeed a form of harassment. however, I believe it would be difficult to prove.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

15.  

    Re:Correction: porn spam

    

    anon, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 6:56pm

    
    

    In the above sitaution, My mail colleagues were *not* finding similar porn messages in tehir inboxes. It became slear to me that I was being singled out as the only female withing a large team of male engineers.
    
    There were additional forms of harassment about which I can sue. the pron messages were really the least of my worries, but irritating.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

16.  

    Re: porn spam

    

    Anonymous Coward, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 6:57pm

    
    

    could you help me?
    
    I am looking for a website to add my co-worker's email address to.
    
    I hate hate him and his "every 15 minutes" cigarette breaks, while the rest of us on staff have to cover his share of the work while he is away from the phones.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

17.  

    Re: If you are getting porn spam...

    

    Woody, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 7:18pm

    
    

    that's just an ignorant comment from someone who obviously haven't been around much with the Internet. Most spam comes from stolen email addresses, not because someone gave their business email to a porn site. Duh!

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

18.  

    

    Anonymous Coward, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 7:40pm

    
    

    Dating websites such as TRUE.com and eHARMONY.com often share your email addresses with it's porn/adult/sexual enhancement partners - which in-tun share those addresses with realestate & other fourth-parties...

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

19.  

    Re: well

    

    Eric, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 7:43pm

    
    

    www.spambayes.org

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

20.  

    

    Matt, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 7:43pm

    
    

    I think that the blocking of spam would fall under the same kind of lawsuit against ISP's that claim to block spam. ISP's that claim to block spam can be held liable for not blocking all spam. I know there was some case on this in the past, i dont know the outcome. but by the company saying that they WILL block spam and then not being able to deliver could be liable on their part. Although if they are smart the policies you sign in order to use their internet should exempt them

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

21.  

    

    Randy, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 7:59pm

    
    

    As long as the company has reasonable SPAM filters in place, there is no legal leg to stand on to sue. My company receives thousands of SPAM messages a day. Majority caught in my filter are for accounts that do not exist within the domain. There are a LOT of pr0n SPAM messages that get blocked. VERY few ever make it to ones inbox, however, if one does, the user knows to move it to a public folder where I can add it to the blacklist.
    
    A company is responsible for the environment of the workplace. Anything they have immediate control over. Someone having pr0n pictures on their workstation, making lewd comments, etc. This does not stop someone from making the comment if they want. If an employee harasses another employee, the company is required to take action. If they do NOT take appropriate action, then the company would lose a lawsuit. If they take proper action, nothing further can be expected of them. You cannot control someones free will. In the same aspect, SPAM pr0n can be controlled so much. If the company has a filter in place, that is apprpriate action. If a message gets through, but the company has procedures in place to add it to a blacklist or delete it, that is appropriate action. The company cannot be held liable for the actions of someone who does not work for their company that is sending SPAM pr0n messages.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

22.  

    

    Patrick, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 8:02pm

    
    

    I think if the legal system wants to hold employers accountable for not removing the pornographic spam solicitations, then companies should hold the government responsible for not making these types of email illegal. I never see my physical mailbox outside my house filled with porno, and even if it was, it would have to be covered per government regulations. Why doesn't the government do this? Perhaps if they will allow spamming to continue, maybe pornographic spam emails contain an html code that first says "click here to open this explicit material". Then you know you can delete it. I know I'm getting off topic, but my point is, if employers are held accountable for this, then the legal system should be held accountable for allowing this spam nonsense to continue.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

23.  

    Can I sue my boss over spam?

    

    Anonymous Coward, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 8:07pm

    
    

    At a recent potluck luncheon, my boss brought spam casserole. I had the choice of not eating it and potentialy getting fired for not being a team player or eating it to keep my job. I was pressured into eating spam. Can I sue?

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

24.  

    

    Anonymous Coward, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 8:43pm

    
    

    Don't forget that many corporate email addresses are lists for workgroups etc. so one person misusing the list address will create a spam problem for all those on the list.
    
    Additionally, many spam bots search websites for email adresses so even if the address was used only for legitimate corporate use, the recipient may still receive spam.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

25.  

    

    Anonymous Coward, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 8:46pm

    
    

    The only way to block 100% of the porn would be to have humans filter all the email for the company first. Of course this would then bring up some privacy lawsuits.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

26.  

    Re: people filtering porn-spam

    

    Anonymous Coward, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 10:09pm

    
    

    not to mention lots of IT guys spending time staring at spam they are supposed to be filtering - hrmmm... why the sudden thousand-fold increase in porn spam - why all the more porn for the IT/email filtering guys to stare at!

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

27.  

    Messed up...

    

    Darknet, Apr 12th, 2006 @ 12:44am

    
    

    This is a pretty messed up concept man, I hope it gets thrown out.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

28.  

    Filtering

    

    Chris, Apr 12th, 2006 @ 12:52am

    
    

    I often have to hear some of the schools claiming that they recieve spam to their inbox. Maybe at the rate of one a day for a couple of the employees (none as yet have been pr0n - most are v1agra spam).
    
    They run spam filters in Outlook as well as running a Barracuda spam filter. This seems to work fairly well - so when they complain about recieving spam I simply say "well, you recieved one today, its blocked over 900, thats a fairly good job if you ask me" ;). That quiets them down just a little.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

29.  

    Can Beat Stupic People With Great Big Sticks If Th

    

    Annoyed, Apr 12th, 2006 @ 1:48am

    
    

    Seriously. Please? Please please please?!

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

30.  

    workplace harrassment

    

    Grant reynolds, Apr 12th, 2006 @ 2:05am

    
    

    What ever hasppend to old fashioned taking care of business? If your harassed kick em in his nuts if its a woman doing it pull her tits HARD!

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

31.  

    workplace harrassment

    

    Grant reynolds, Apr 12th, 2006 @ 2:08am

    
    

    What ever hasppend to old fashioned taking care of business? If your harassed kick em in his nuts if its a woman doing it punch her in the tit. Settle it like back in the old days. Every body needs to grow up.
    Check my site.
    
    What is this the USA the land of the free or the land of the immature crybabies. Take self defense classes. When your assaulted break his/her wrist/s I guarantee they won't try iot again for a long time at leat 3 months. GR. C.F.O.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

32.  

    workplace harrassment

    

    Grant reynolds, Apr 12th, 2006 @ 2:08am

    
    

    What ever hasppend to old fashioned taking care of business? If your harassed kick em in his nuts if its a woman doing it punch her in the tit. Settle it like back in the old days. Every body needs to grow up.
    Check my site.
    
    What is this the USA the land of the free or the land of the immature crybabies. Take self defense classes. When your assaulted break his/her wrist/s I guarantee they won't try iot again for a long time at leat 3 months. GR. C.F.O.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

33.  

    

    Zeroth404, Apr 12th, 2006 @ 5:57am

    
    

    Porn Spam may be harassment, but nothing more than solicitation harrassment.
    
    This is just silly.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

34.  

    Re: Can I sue my boss over spam?

    

    Spam Cookie Cutters, Apr 12th, 2006 @ 11:28am

    
    

    Hmm. Well, it depends on if it was pornographic or not. What was the spam shaped like?

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

35.  

    Re: Re: porn spam

    

    Think Outside The Cube, Apr 12th, 2006 @ 11:34am

    
    

    Hmm. If you hate him that much, just post a copy of his resume on Monster.com? Make one up if you have to, but include his work telephone extension on the resume. And in another few weeks, maybe he'll have a job working somewhere else more appropriate for his choice of lung ailments, like a coal mine or something. And if that doesn't work, maybe they'll fire him if your HR runs across his resume and thinks he's looking for work elsewhere. If you want to speed the process along, you could even make the inclusion of his work number a "typo" that goes to his boss or to HR. WARNING: IF HE IS A REAL IDIOT, BEWARE!!! IT'S POSSIBLE THAT ONCE YOUR COMPANY THINKS HE'S LOOKING FOR WORK ELSEWHERE THEY MIGHT TRY TO RETAIN HIM BY **GIVING***HIM***A***RAISE!*** OR BY PROMOTING HIM TO MANAGEMENT -- WHERE HE COULD BE YOUR BOSS. Or not. Hard to say. Life's fulla fun risks, anyway, though, and meddling like this could be fun. I say go for the fun aspect. Just don't use your company's network to post the resume or the gig's up -- yours, perhaps. HAVE FUN!!!

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

36.  

    Er...Delete?

    

    |333173|3|_||3, Feb 4th, 2007 @ 8:06pm

    
    

    IS that hard? Just flag it a s spam, do whatever you have to do to get the addresss blacklisted, and get over it.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment