FCC Issues Rules Against Junk Faxes, Problem Probably Not Gone
from the legislative-attempts dept
The FCC finally came out with guidelines in implementing the Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005. Depending on whom you talk to, it either opens the floodgates for more junk faxes or radically limits it. At issue is the requirement that a sender of commercial faxes has an existing business relationship with the receiver. Some worry that this could be defined liberally, so that anyone who looked at a company's website could claim a "relationship", but the definition found in the FCC directive (warning .pdf) appears to clearly define this as some sort of transaction, or two-way communication based on sales of products or services. It specifies that an inquiry pertaining to, say, the location of a store doesn't qualify. It also specifies that the receiver can request a stop to the faxes at any time, though "opt out" solutions haven't been too popular in the past. The issue of junk faxes, which hasn't gotten as much attention as spam, has been a legal issue for some time, with The Congress having taken up the issue a couple of years ago. While the latest FCC ruling looks like a positive step, it's clear that legislative solutions can be pretty complicated. Also, with the ability to send faxes over the internet, this probably won't do much to prevent fax spam from overseas.






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Junk Faxes
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Seemed to work well.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Solution:
I've noticed recently that I don't get very many junk FedEx overnight mailers.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
"No Call List"
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Our expectations are so low, and not without reason.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Fax Machines - How Quaint
I haven't had a fax machine for over a decade - and enjoy a hearty scornful laugh at anyone dumb enough to suggest I need one.
Anything a fax machine can do, PDF and email can do better. You don't have a way to scan in signatures or hand sketched drawings - that's your problem you Luddite, not mine.
Besides saving on the cost of a fax machine, and all the consumables, I haven't had a fax line charge for 12 years (which in my area mean's a saving of over $6000)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment