Shocker: Nothing Wrong With Doing A Bit Of Historical Research For A Novel
from the congrats-on-the-publicity dept
Back in February, there was a story about two publicity seeking authors who sued Dan Brown, author of The Da Vinci Code for the horrible crime of doing some research for his novel. The pair of authors who were suing had written what was supposedly a non-fiction book (though, the work has been pretty thoroughly debunked), from which Brown took the basis of his plot for the fiction novel. For some reason, they thought this entitled them to payment. If they were really claiming their book was non-fiction, then this is problematic, because you can't copyright "facts." However, it became pretty clear that this was all just a publicity stunt for their book (whose sales have shot way up since the association between the two books was publicized). Either way, it appears that the judge in the case has recognized how pointless this all is and has thrown out the case. Of course, the timing of the case coming so close to the release of the movie based on the novel seems to add weight to the idea it was all a publicity stunt. Nice to know that the court systems are wasting plenty of time and taxpayer money to help boost book sales.






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
fines all around
I bill at $150/hour.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: fines all around
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
At least...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: At least...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
I wasn't shocked
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Not our tax money
At least this time it is not my tax dollar.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Huh?
But a couple lines later you write, "Nice to know that the court systems are wasting plenty of time and taxpayer money to help boost book sales."
Are you accusing the author or the court for wasting time and money? You said yourself that the judge saw the pointlessness of the case and threw it out. But then you blame the court in the last sentence.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Huh?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Huh?
Are you accusing the author or the court for wasting time and money? You said yourself that the judge saw the pointlessness of the case and threw it out. But then you blame the court in the last sentence.
Blaming the authors for bringing the case and wasting the court's money (funded by taxpayers, of course). Sorry if the wording is unclear.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Also of interest
Makes you wonder who was promoting whom with the movie coming out?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment