When Will They Learn? Yet Another Video Game Law Declared Unconstitutional

from the try,-try-again dept

Some politicians, it seems, will never learn. Despite being court after court after court after court striking down each state law that would ban the sale of video games to minors, the various states have to keep trying… only to have the laws thrown out in court again. Following a temporary injunction from late last year that stopped the law from going into effect, the court has now granted a permanent injunction against the law, noting that the evidence presented by the state in support of the law was unconvincing. It tried to use some of the various studies trying to show a link between video games and violence, but the judge recognized all the typical problems with such studies, and gave some good quotes in response: “it could just as easily be said that the interactive element in video games acts as an outlet for minors to vent their violent or aggressive behavior, thereby diminishing the chance they would actually perform such acts in reality….Not only does the Act not materially advance the state’s stated interest, but it appears to discriminate against a disfavored ‘newcomer’ in the world of entertainment media. Thus, ‘singling out’ the videogame industry does not advance the state’s alleged goal.” Why do we get the feeling this won’t be the last such lawsuit or law we’ll be hearing about?


Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “When Will They Learn? Yet Another Video Game Law Declared Unconstitutional”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
43 Comments
Pemrick69 (user link) says:

Who needs to learn what?

And the problem with this law is… what? Why are we debating whether exposing a minor to violence is bad? The movie industry already decided this, by restricting the sale of tickets and movies to R-rated movies, and the music industry decided that mature content shouldn’t be sold to minors, with the use of the parental advisory sign. (Did they update this too a new system? If they did, I wouldn’t have noticed.) So, how exactly would declaring a law to restrict the sale of video games with mature rated content to minors “discriminate against a disfavored ‘newcomer’ in the world of entertainment media”? Because the other entertainment outlets are… already forced to follow these rules?

Mike (profile) says:

Re: Who needs to learn what?

Why are we debating whether exposing a minor to violence is bad? The movie industry already decided this, by restricting the sale of tickets and movies to R-rated movies, and the music industry decided that mature content shouldn’t be sold to minors, with the use of the parental advisory sign.

Both are cases where the industry has agreed to do this *voluntarily* themselves. In neither case is the government involved.

The constitution is pretty clear that the gov’t cannot restrict free speech…

Tyshaun says:

Re: Re: Who needs to learn what?

Why are we debating whether exposing a minor to violence is bad? The movie industry already decided this, by restricting the sale of tickets and movies to R-rated movies, and the music industry decided that mature content shouldn’t be sold to minors, with the use of the parental advisory sign.

Both are cases where the industry has agreed to do this *voluntarily* themselves. In neither case is the government involved.

The constitution is pretty clear that the gov’t cannot restrict free speech…

Mike, you are absolutely wrong, at least about the music censorship. The music ratings systems were a direct result of the congressional hearings held on music lyrics in the 1980’s. Remember when groups like Twisted Sister and Ice T had to get up before congress and explain their lyrics to everyone? If memory serves Al Gores wife was the major champion of this one. Sure, in the end the music industry “voluntairly” put ratings on the msuic, but it was to avert the federal government coming up with it’s own standards.

Joel Moore says:

Re: Who needs to learn what?

And the problem with this law is… what? Why are we debating whether exposing a minor to violence is bad? The movie industry already decided this, by restricting the sale of tickets and movies to R-rated movies, and the music industry decided that mature content shouldn’t be sold to minors, with the use of the parental advisory sign. (Did they update this too a new system? If they did, I wouldn’t have noticed.) So, how exactly would declaring a law to restrict the sale of video games with mature rated content to minors “discriminate against a disfavored ‘newcomer’ in the world of entertainment media”? Because the other entertainment outlets are… already forced to follow these rules?

You are misinformed. Selling a CD with an “Explicit Lyrics” label on it or letting a 13 year old into a rated R movie is not against the law. Games already have a voluntary rating system just like movies and music.

The problem here is that the older generation that’s making these laws hasn’t figured out that games aren’t just for kids anymore. Because they are so out of touch with modern culture, they don’t seem to understand what is happening to the game-playing demographic.

Vinnie says:

Re: Re: Who needs to learn what?

You are misinformed. Selling a CD with an “Explicit Lyrics” label on it or letting a 13 year old into a rated R movie is not against the law.

Actually in many states (maybe all of them?) it is illegal to let a 13 year-old into an R rated movie and the theater can be fined or even shut-down if it happens habitually.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re: ........

” ‘You are misinformed. Selling a CD with an “Explicit Lyrics” label on it or letting a 13 year old into a rated R movie is not against the law.’

Actually in many states (maybe all of them?) it is illegal to let a 13 year-old into an R rated movie and the theater can be fined or even shut-down if it happens habitually.”

That’s not entirely true either, a parent or guardian can escort someone under the age of 18 into an R rated movie at the theater. NC-17 is another issue, but how often do NC-17 movies make it to the big screen (very rare)…

“The only thing consistent with people that commit acts of violence is that they are most likely victims of violence themselves. Since things like parenting aren’t manditorily taught in most schools it’s far easier to create scapegoats than to blame parents for not ending the cycle of violence. Two things that don’t come with instructions are babies and money. Imagine how much better society would be if they actually taught the important things in school.”

I agree with the thought, but have you considered that in a homeschool environment you CAN teach the important things like parenting and finances. If you look at the statistics, homeschooled children have an 80% higher full scholarship rate to colleges than public school students. Why? First there is a one-on-one atmosphere that promotes faster learning (instead of repeating the stuff several times for the two or three kids in the back of the class). Then you have self-paced learning to boot, meaning if a kid obviously understands a subject well s/he will go through it in less time that a public school is required to repeat it.

“Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have …. The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases. — Thomas Jefferson”

I think we have had enough examples of that recently to really sound the alarm. ‘What’s that, you want private property? Well, this company is willing to pay higher taxes on the land so we are going to take it from you.’

Sean says:

Re: Who needs to learn what?

The problem with the law is the fact that it would just be the start of something. They wouldn’t stop there. Eventually they would try to ban violent videogames outright. There is a rating system in place on video games. Parents are the ones to blame! Watch your kids, play games with them, make sure that what they play is appropriate for their age group. People think that tv, movies and video games are good babysitters. Don’t just plunk your kids in front of a tv. Spend time with them. You can’t blame all problems on the entertainment industry.

Vinnie says:

Re: Who needs to learn what?

The videogame industry already has a self-imposed rating system. If stores don’t follow it, or parents don’t pay attention to it, it’s not the videogame producer’s fault.

I would think that gun’s rights advocates would be all over this, remember videogames don’t kill people, people kill people.

Anonymous Coward says:

damnit, politicians need to get with the time, set up an agency just for technology, like netforce. they need to know what is going on, figure out the technology issues, like internet, video games, spam, patent issues. then all our taxpayer dollars wont go to waste in court when it could go to something usefull like this agency that has knowledge on the issues

Anonymous Coward says:

The only thing consistent with people that commit acts of violence is that they are most likely victims of violence themselves. Since things like parenting aren’t manditorily taught in most schools it’s far easier to create scapegoats than to blame parents for not ending the cycle of violence. Two things that don’t come with instructions are babies and money. Imagine how much better society would be if they actually taught the important things in school.

Arthur says:

video games

oh my god. leave us kids alone. if you ban video games minors they are ganna grow up to be sissies. there is on guy in florida, shot 20 bullets hit 1 person. he never playe a video game. a kid in highschool shot 5 bullets, killed 7 people. that kid played doom4, and half life, and halo. fuck you fucking politicains, stop it, or your asses will be killed, god damn just give it up. Jails are already overcrowded. if you ban them, come on idiots, you can them illegaly. i know someone who got halo 2 weeks before it came out. so fuck you, there is no way out. i’m ganna kill you with unreal tornament arsonel weapons

Mike says:

Re: video games

“oh my god. leave us kids alone. if you ban video games minors they are ganna grow up to be sissies. there is on guy in florida, shot 20 bullets hit 1 person. he never playe a video game. a kid in highschool shot 5 bullets, killed 7 people. that kid played doom4, and half life, and halo. fuck you fucking politicains, stop it, or your asses will be killed, god damn just give it up. Jails are already overcrowded. if you ban them, come on idiots, you can them illegaly. i know someone who got halo 2 weeks before it came out. so fuck you, there is no way out. i’m ganna kill you with unreal tornament arsonel weapons”

This is the reasons why some kids shouldn’t get their hands on violent games. Whatever happened to good ol’ spanking to learn some respect?

CYBERDEMON says:

ROAR! ARRR!

SOME BITCH ASS JUST SHOT ME DICK OFF WITH A BFG. I GOT HARD AND BEAT HIS ASS WITH MY CLUB DICK. I MADE SOME EGGS AND CHILLED WHILE THE DORF LOOKED AT THE PENTAGRAM GOAT ASS TEXTURES AND MADE SOME BACON. HE STARTED WORSHIPPING SATAN AND SUCKING COCK. THEN HE SHOT ME DICK AND BALLS OFF AGAIN WITH A SHOT GUN. HE HELD THE SHOT GUN IN ONE OF HIS LEFT HANDS AND LOADED IT WITH HIS OTHER LEFT HAND. THEN HE ATE ME TWIG AND BERRIES AND JERKED OFF MY NUTSACK. HE STRECHED IT OUT AND JUMPED ROPE WITH IT WHILE HE SHIT ON HIS MOMS BALLS. SHIT WAS GETING IT FROM A MUTANT IMP PENIS WHILE IT DRANK PISS AND SHIT BULLETS. WELL, I GUESS IT’S TIME FOR ME TO SUCK JESUS OFF AND BEAT DAN BROWNS NUTS OFF.

Mystik says:

Video games are our friends

You must understand that if video games can be seen as additives to youth violence, look at movies, and extracirricular sports like football or martial arts or any kind of contact sport. Those could potentially lead to youth violence (only taken from a view of stupid politian pigs).

I play video games alot. I love the fact that I can do almost anything in them. Video games are like books but are interactive and make your own story.

complete insanity says:

stfuartfm

freedom of speech is freedom of speech, you can’t always be there to cover your childrens ears or their eyes. if you would follow your kids that closely they would never grow up anyways and there would only be more problems. it is no surprise that kids today seem so foreign, most parents haven’t taken the time to teach them or get to know them. kids today grow up in fantasy and then the lie of what is taught to shelter and keep them safe sets in suddenly and then what you try to say after that is nothing that is to be believed. word of advice…stop lying to your kids.

Andrew Strasser (user link) says:

Video games are a learning console.

Though there are those games which seem to be explicit in some ways. I have to say that video games are what teach the younger generation how to use the computers, they will need their entire life, better. This judge has made a very good choice and deserves some credit as he actually researched the subject before jumping into any major decisions like most judges so often do. I think this judge is a credit to the judicial system and wish more judges would take a second and think outside the box.

deviantion says:

god knows what

Hmm, but not that many americans are motivated enough to actually go out and buy a chemistry/math/etc book and learn it for themselves (in no time flat really but anyway). Additionally, there are several fundamental problems with homeschooling as it also creates an environment in which a child could be subjected to subjective subjects, which may not necesarily be bad but it does hinder a child from making his/her own stand on things, based on cold hard facts. Really i think a combination of all 3 of the learning systems should be encouraged as all 3 have their benefits (especially the last one in my opinion)

BUT, that is completly beside the point

Ok, so about video games …

Sure, if only the average american parent would pay more attention to their children, all would be dandy, but thats not the case. As a result, the government Has to step in to make up for lost ground. Either create local “better-parenting” seminars for new and old mothers alike, which is a more long term plan methinks, Or teach children that the negative behavior shown in video games is well, negative, which could be inserted into any health class.

O’course, you could always ban exessively violent video games to minors (btw, minors as in 18yr olds? thats a bit harsh .. 16 yr olds are pretty smart kids too), but … no.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...