Appeals Court Recognizes Limits To On Demand Printing Patent

from the reverses-the-decision dept

Two years ago, Ingram and Amazon lost a patent battle concerning an "on demand" printing technique. Ingram had created a system that would let publishers and retailers print books in bulk -- which fits with their distribution business. However, this inventor had been able to get a patent on the idea of a quick printing machine for a single book -- designed mainly to be used within retail stores. While some may question the non-obviousness of such an idea (one that's been talked about for ages), it seems that such a device has little to do with the Ingram and Amazon's efforts... and it appears that an Appeals Court has agreed, overturning the original decision. It's good to see that the court didn't think that just because this guy had a patent on one small area of on-demand book printing, he could somehow claim ownership of the whole concept.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Joe Smith, Apr 3rd, 2006 @ 5:22pm

    Obviousness

    The thing to note is that the defendants had to go to the court of appeal to win a case which should never have been brought in the first place.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This