Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   

   Andrew, Mar 7th, 2006 @ 2:24pm

   
   

   Fake markets actually do work...within reason

   Many market simulations fail because the experimenters fail to create a proper reward or penalty system. The markets mentioned are imprecise representations of the work of Vernon Smith (the guy that got the 2002 Noble in economics for his work in this area). Like any cargo cult approach to science, something has to actually replicate the right conditions and not just appear to.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   

   John Lambert, Mar 7th, 2006 @ 3:22pm

   
   

   There's a market for everything...

   I could really use some good fake predictions. I'm always being asked how long something's going to take me when I have no basis for forecasting the time required. I'll sign up for one-a-day.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3.  

   

   John, Mar 7th, 2006 @ 6:16pm

   
   

   Just like poker

   This phenomenon can also be observed when people play poker for fake money. All of a sudden they are willing to take chances and risks that they wouldnt take with there were appropriate consequences for being wrong. A lot of people tell me they want to learn poker but then play on the fake money websites. They end up learning very little - even if they are playing a proper game with a view to accumlating as much fake money as possible, there are always enough people that dont care, such that what they learn is really just bunk and not applicable to a real money game. Same goes here - we learn nothing about trends since people arent making "real" decisions.
   
   - John

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4.  

   

   ?, Mar 7th, 2006 @ 11:13pm

   
   

   Yup

   It is a time waster, a game. No money lost, nothing gained, cept a little ego if your guess prove right.
   
   :)

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

5.  

   

   dan mayer, Mar 8th, 2006 @ 8:53am

   
   

   still

   still there is something to be said for the collective concious, and that is what they are harnessing. It is the same as some machine learning techniques instead of making a very complex learning algo you have a bunch of tiny simplestic learning models, like short prediction trees, then you ahve all the very simplestic models vote. You set some sort of voting threashold and viola you have a very high success rate...
   
   so get a bunch of pretty dumb (about the subject) people with limited knowledge and it might work the same and predict some very interesting results.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

6.  

   

   CrowdIQ Team, Mar 13th, 2006 @ 8:03am

   
   

   Love to get your thoughts...

   ...on our little project. We're almost identical to Inkling, minus, the UI and Trading Engine Abstraction. But we're in the process of building our trading community and hope we can become the eBay of prediction market.s

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

7.  

   

   David Pennock, May 29th, 2006 @ 4:23am

   
   

   Fake money sometimes good enough

   I agree with some of this reasoning (e.g., the poker example) but, perhaps surprisingly, research shows that in some circumstances, fake-money markets are just as accurate as real-money markets in terms of their predictive ability:

   Prediction Markets: Does Money Matter? - (PDF) , Electronic Markets, 2004

   The Real Power of Artificial Markets, Science, 2001

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment