It's Illegal Not To Include Copy Protection In DVD Players?
from the but-why? dept
Thanks to John for passing on this story that Samsung is facing a lawsuit from a number of movie studios, though over what is still a bit up in the air. Samsung believes it's about a DVD player they stopped making and shipping over a year ago. The movie studios are upset that people could use the DVD player to avoid DVD copy protection, but it's not entirely clear (1) why that's illegal and (2) why the studios are suddenly interested in this so long after the product has been removed from the market.






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Streisand Effect and eBay...
I would just love to see these Samsung DVD-HD841 players start going for $500 each on eBay.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
New copy protection coming
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
Be thankful that we have DVD and not that crappy DIVX license-driven format to deal with.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Background
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
DVD Players in Asia
DiVX is great. Great quality and the size that lets you burn 4 four feature movies on a standard DVD. Nice!
China has made a big industry copying content from Hollywood. I think we are in this cat and mouse game for a long time.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: DVD Players in Asia
The other Divx is an encoding standard created a few years ago that, as is mentioned, allows you to store high quality video in a compressed format that allows 4 times more video per disk.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: DVD Players in Asia
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Breach of contract/license
That would make this a breach of contract, not a violation of law.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Breach of contract/license
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
Possibly the studios feel that the DVD player in question represents such a threat that they must stomp on it quickly with a civil case before finally killing it with a criminal case. However, I wonder why they want to spend the money on a private suit against a product that is already supposed to be off the market. This seems like anything but a clear-cut DMCA case.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
...
solution: we start killing lawyers in front of their families.
lawyers need to be put in their place in this society, that place being UNDER the piece of shit stuck to my shoe. they're thoroughly worthless and evil people.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ...
Like the kind who watched, and enjoyed Brokeback Mountian?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
Sure that's still a flawed argument, but I didn't think DRM was mandatory... yet.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment