UK Politicians Decide Police Shouldn't Have The Last Word In Taking Down Website
from the getting-a-judge-involved dept
Over in the UK, it looks like the House of Lords has narrowly (one vote) struck down a proposed law that would allow the police to determine what online content they found objectionable concerning terrorism. Instead, police will need to go to a judge to first get approval in order to ask an ISP to remove content that they feel is dangerous. Is it really such a crazy idea to ask that there be some sort of official process and review when it comes to things like forcing content offline?
3 Comments | Leave a Comment..
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Schrödinger's Download: Whether Or Not An iTunes Music Sale Is A 'Sale' Depends On Who's Suing
- We Don't Have A 'Wild West' Internet Now, But We Will If SOPA Or Similar Is Passed
- One Nation, Under Guard
- Supreme Court Denies Appeal For The Pirate Bay Founders
- White House Says It Can't Comment On Possible Chris Dodd Investigation





Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
loophole?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: loophole?
Hah.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
It's not about inappropriate websites...
Giving the police the power to take down "inappropriate" sites leads to an arbitrary decision as to what is considered "inappropriate".
This ruling simply means that the final decision has to go through the courts... which I consider a reasonable and necessary check on police power.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment