Wireless

Wireless

by Carlo Longino




Shocker -- First WiMAX Equipment Actually Certified

from the finally dept

Even as late as yesterday there were rumors that certification of the first WiMAX equipment wouldn't be completed in time to make the WiMAX Forum's self-appointed goal of having an announcement to make at a broadband trade show this week, but in a development completely atypical of the delay-ridden history of WiMAX, they actually made it -- three base stations and one piece of customer-premises equipment are the first real, certified WiMAX products. But, as Steve Stroh points out, this equipment has been certified for 3.5GHz spectrum only -- spectrum only being used outside the US. So, regardless of what press releases and news articles say, there's still no WiMAX in the US. Also, certification testing of 5.8GHz WiMAX equipment -- the stuff that operates in unlicensed frequencies that's spawned the "anybody can be a broadband provider with WiMAX!" stories -- won't begin until the end of the year in the very best case.

9 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    Jan 19th, 2006 @ 2:22pm
  • No Subject Given

    by Anonymous Coward

    Ah, but can they be imported??

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Jan 19th, 2006 @ 2:28pm
    • Re: No Subject Given

      by M.C.

      Yes, but for a large scale implementation, you'd need to import the transmitters/recievers for each pc/notebook/other gadget for each machine on the system, since nothing is compatible with WiMAX yet.

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      • Jan 19th, 2006 @ 2:38pm
      • Re: No Subject Given

        by Anonymous Coward

        saright. All I need is one AP and 3 laptop recievers.

        (I wonder if I could hook extenders into neighbors vehicles...set up a roaming, expandable net)

        Skynet...here I come!

        (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      • Jan 19th, 2006 @ 4:35pm
      • Re: No Subject Given

        by C.P

        Actually, all of the Intel Centrino processors made in the second half of 2005 are "compatible" with WiMAX. This probably means that a software update sometime in the forseeable future will enable the capabilities of WiMAX. But who knows.

        (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

        • Jan 19th, 2006 @ 8:20pm
        • Re: No Subject Given

          by chris

          it still won't transmit or recieve on the same frequencies

          (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

          • Jan 19th, 2006 @ 11:33pm
          • Importation

            by Zealot

            The problem seems to be that the "imports" would broadcast on regulated frequences, not that they'll magically stop working in the U.S. or require a wall socket adapter or something.

            (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      Jan 20th, 2006 @ 7:14am
    • Sure,but the FCC wouldn't like that

      by Mark

      3.5ghz is licensed in the US; I'm not sure but I think it's being used for cell phones here. If you use that equipment and it interferes with your local cell phone carrier be prepared to be shut down in a HURRY!

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      • Jan 20th, 2006 @ 8:45am
      • Re: Sure,but the FCC wouldn't like that

        by Anonymous Coward

        3.5 GHz is not used for mobile phones in the US, it's allocated for military applications.

        Current Centrino chips _can not_ become WiMAX-enabled through a software upgrade. Their radios simply don't support it.

        Furthermore, WiMAX equipment isn't like WiFi -- it's carrier-grade gear, not something you use to set up a home network.

        (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

        • Jan 20th, 2006 @ 2:28pm
        • Re: Sure,but the FCC wouldn't like that

          Why all this 3.5/5.8GHz business, soon we'll have two fairly incompatible systems, like PAL/NTSC, GSM/CDMA et al...C'mon can't we agree on one system across the globe?

          But on the other hand...competing standards can be a good thing...hmmm

          (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It