RSS
DirecTV To Announce Wireless Broadband Plans... Soon
from the all-in-your-own-time dept
As part of the speech in which he announced a plan for MySpace, News Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch also said the company would detail DirecTV's wireless broadband plans within the next two months. Murdoch says the company could invest $1 billion in some sort of broadband network, confirming earlier rumors that the company was eyeing the market. Speculation still holds that the company will build a WiMAX network, but whatever DirecTV does, it's hard to see it acting alone, as $1 billion doesn't buy a lot of spectrum these days. In any case, all these rumors and speculation are plenty of fun, but talk is cheap. The wireless broadband market is ready for some real competition -- so let's see some action.
11 Comments | Leave a Comment..
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Beastie Boy Mike D Forces AT&T To Let Shareholders Vote On Net Neutrality
- Congress Trying To Regulate Certain Wireless Spectrum Issues... In A Payroll Tax Bill?
- Verizon Wireless: Paying Online Is More Convenient, So Now You Have To Pay $2 To Do So [Updated]
- Is Verizon Wireless Violating Its Promise To Be Open By Blocking Google Wallet?
- Innovation In Wireless: The Disruption In Connectivity
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Who wants to trust DirecTV for their broadband - a
After living with dial up for a year or so, I requested a 768K/768K symetrical DSL line through a company called Telocity. It worked great - couldn't complain about anything...
DirecTV wanted to get into the non-satellite broadband market and they bought up Telocity. they changed us to a 768/256K assymetrical DSL for the same price.
Approximately a year later they hit a financial hard spot and immediately jettisoned all of their not-a-huge-profit business units, which included their DirecTV DSL service.
Thousands of customers were given very little notice (less than 60 days) and the only option we were given was to switch to SBC-Yahoo! DSL, who had been providing the last mile to our homes all along. SBC refused to allow me to buy DSL from them since my home phone service wasn't through them and they totally ignored the fact that I currently had SBC DSL coming into my home - so sorry, if you won't pay a premium price for home phone service - you can't have DSL.
At that point I switched to a cable modem which I've been using ever since.
After being screwed by them twice, I won't rely on DirecTV to provide me anything ever again.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Needs $8-12 billion
The equipment alone is going to run over $5 billion and spectrum is quite expensive.
$1 billion is great if rupert intends to build a network to service select portions of middle of no where but its not going to do much for wimax. Then again perhaps rupert believes he can deploy wimax with 30 mile cells.
Just like fox, i've reported and I've decided. This ain't happening and it will not work if it does anyway.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
DirecTV - Broadband move makes sense
DirecTV has been partnering with ILECs to bundle their DSL products with the TV product, but it is a less than stable relationship considering that the phone companies want to distribute their own TV content.
A move like this, or perhaps a partnership with a wireless provider without an ILEC investment like Sprint makes a lot of sense. TV plus WiMax/EvDO service or a successor technology allows DirecTV to fight the cable companies more successfully.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
FYI: You don't buy WiMax spectrum
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Needs $8-12 billion
How much to piggy-back on an already built network? Sprint has a pretty extensive EvDO network in most major markets. The spectrum is already purchased, the towers are in place, etc. $1 billion would probably go a long way toward completing the build out.
For that matter, T-Mobile has their EDGE network. Again, a billion goes a long way toward extending the reach of an already developed infrastructure.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: FYI: You don't buy WiMax spectrum
Er, yes and no. WiMax will work in both licensed and unlicensed spectrum, but it's HIGHLY unlikely that a company like DirecTV would try to use unlicensed spectrum, where they'd face all sorts of interference challenges. Almost every commercial WiMax offering will focus on licensed spectrum, and that's not cheap.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Competition?
I have to say, I never honestly thought I'd see competition and Rupert Murdoch in the same paragraph.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Murdoch WiMax Plans
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Needs $8-12 billion
I read a recent analyst report that said it would only cost $1.5 billion to build a coast to coast network that would cover 84% of the continental US population.
Unfortunately, I do not have a copy of the statement immediately available.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Wimax
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment