Shouldn't Lawyers Sending Out Nastygrams Online Understand The Internet First?

from the it-would-probably-help dept

It's amazing sometimes to see what happens when lawyers who don't seem to understand the internet start freaking out about something online. You would think, by now, people would know to go and ask someone who knows a little better to explain what's going on -- but we still see bizarre cases that never would have gone anywhere if someone had simply spent a tiny bit of time asking how the internet works, and whether or not there's a real issue.. John points us to a situation in Germany, where a blogger received a legal nastygram from the Sozialgericht Bremen, "a court of law for dealing with cases in the area of German social services" because his blog shows up in a Google search for Sozialgericht Bremen. Obviously, it seems silly to think that it would be illegal to mention Sozialgericht Bremen online, and after that, it's hard to see how the blogger in question has any control over where his site appears on a Google search for that term. However, that won't stop some lawyers from assuming that someone must be to blame -- and when someone's to blame, out come the legal nastygrams, even if they have no basis in, say, law.

10 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    Wouldn't it be funny if

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 3rd, 2006 @ 10:59pm

    Lawyers shut down Techdirt with frivolous claims, wearing down all its financial resources? Mike's strategy of being anti-establishment invites this fate.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    Re: Wouldn't it be funny if

    identicon
    Colby, Jan 3rd, 2006 @ 11:53pm

    What an irrelevant comment. I hate your comment, and I love Tech Dirt.

    People + Lack of Knowledge + Pride = i.e. Sozialgericht Bremen

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    No Subject Given

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 3rd, 2006 @ 11:58pm

    Can we get a Google top 10 here...

    Sozialgericht Bremen

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    Top 15 of 2005 Year-End Google Zeitgeist

    identicon
    Google Press Center, Jan 4th, 2006 @ 12:17am

    Top 15 of 2005 Year-End Google Zeitgeist
    From http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist.html

    1. richard pryor
    2. tookie
    3. john lennon
    4. jennifer aniston
    5. debra lafave
    6. ann coulter
    7. chronicles of narnia
    8. lillo brancato jr.
    9. brokeback mountain
    10. making the band 3
    11. survivor
    12. hermione
    13. syriana
    14. luciana bozan
    15. pearl harbor

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  

    No Subject Given

    identicon
    Joerg, Jan 4th, 2006 @ 4:27am

    I am not sure if there were lawyers involved yet. It was the director of the Sozialgericht who personally felt offended and send out that letter, only threatening legal consequences. No idea whether she is a lawyer.
    Very ridiculous still...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  

    No Subject Given

    identicon
    B-diggity, Jan 4th, 2006 @ 6:34am

    Should #7 be

    Chronic-what-cles of Narnia?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  

    Those Damn German Lawyers!

    identicon
    giafly, Jan 4th, 2006 @ 8:25am

    Why don't they just sue Google for $billions like Americans would? It's positively undemocratic!

    But they'll be really unhappy about what this has done for their Google results (count the blog entries).

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  

    No Subject Given

    identicon
    Michael, Jan 4th, 2006 @ 9:09am

    What makes this so much more amusing is the sheer mass of people linking to his blog in response to the letter, and the sharp rise in the number of times "Sozialgericht Bremen" is mentioned on his blog because he allows comments. His site will be number 1 in no time.
    Ahhh... when the arrogant and ignorant collide ;)

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  

    Re: No Subject Given

    identicon
    crankysysadmin, Jan 4th, 2006 @ 10:35am

    Not only was it just the director of the Sozialgericht, it's all about a "Zuordnungsverwirrung" -- that is, she (the director) is claiming that a casual Internet user could be fooled into thinking the blogger's website was actually the website of the Sozialgericht, because the *title* of the page which is appearing in the Google result is simply "Sozialgericht Bremen" (and not, for example, "Blog post about Sozialgericht Bremen"). She mentions that it's misleading because in the Google summary, you see the page title before you visit the page.

    Yes, she's threatening with laws & such, but you need to know the Germans to know that this is kind of a nonaggressive and almost socially acceptable message, and it shouldn't be understood in American hyperlitigious terms... if you ask me.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  

    Re: No Subject Given

    identicon
    Andrew Strasser, Jan 4th, 2006 @ 2:00pm

    Like comedy...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This