Court Says Message Board Mocking Is Protected Speech

from the go-ahead-and-mock-away dept

Nearly a year and a half ago, we wrote about a lawyer who was upset at being mocked on some Yahoo message boards -- and tried to organized a class action lawsuit against the company and some of the posters. He was upset at Yahoo for (1) failing to stop these mocking posts, which he believed went against the company's terms of service and (2) not providing accurate info about who the posters were. Apparently, he did get enough info to sue at least one user, Ron Long, who he believed was responsible for the mocking posts. Long's lawyer, Joe Ribakoff writes in with an update: "In August '04, you ran an article about a lawsuit filed against Yahoo by LA insurance lawyer Stephen Galton. The lawsuit complained that Yahoo was allowing people to mock Galton on a message board. Galton sued not only Yahoo. He also filed a defamation action against Ron Long, the person he believed had mocked him. The California Court of Appeals has now dismissed Galton's lawsuit against Long. On December 22, 2005, it issued an unpublished decision that found that the messages mocking Galton were 1st Amendment protected speech. The Court also ordered Galton to pay Long's attorney's bill. The bottom line is: Mocking Stephen Galton is protected 1st Amendment speech. Galton may sue you, but he will lose and he will pay your attorney's fees." It would be nice if this decision was published somewhere, because right now we only have the word of this lawyer who was involved in the lawsuit to go on. Update: Thanks to someone in the comments for linking to a PDF version of the court's ruling, which makes for interesting reading -- noting, basically, that no one with an ounce of common sense would assume that the posts (which are included in the file) were meant to be taken literally based on both the language used in them (which, while definitely "mocking" isn't libelous) and the nature of the forum itself.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Aidan Maconachy, Jan 3rd, 2006 @ 12:06am

    No Subject Given

    It amazes me that Galton went as far taking this to court.

    People are defamed all the time on the net. It's the nature of the beast. I thought lawyers had thicker skin - they certainly do when it comes to nailing their clients for hefty fees :)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 3rd, 2006 @ 1:27am

    If you dont like what you read, dont read it.

    If you dont like what you read, dont read it. or better yet, use the same tactics to prove what you're reading is wrong. let the people decide - and if they decide against you, the is probably a good reason behind that.

    How "self-centered" this one guy is... to believe that the WHOLE WORLD revolves around him (and that the WHOLE WORLD actually believes everything that is written on the internet is actually true.)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Devang, Jan 3rd, 2006 @ 2:08am

    PDF of case judgement

    here is the judgement. The good stuff starts on pg 23.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This