UK Police Can't Get Computers To Share Info Until 2010

from the fire-the-programmers dept

Ah, we love a good story about a technology boondoggle. Remember the "revolutionary" $230 million computerized baggage claim system in Denver that, massively delayed the opening of the new airport there, but also was never really used before being shut down completely? It looks like the UK police may be working on something to rival that. Apparently, they've invested in a ~$290 million computer system to let police better share data -- and the folks working on that project have just announced that, due to various problems, it won't be ready until 2010 at the earliest. Also, it sounds like various other components are being scaled back and delivered late at the same time. Yes, we realize that building such a large computer system, and making sure that it's secure, can be a complex task. However, taking five years seems a bit extreme. Not only does it raise questions about whoever is working on the project, it also makes you wonder just how obsolete the system will be by the time it actually rolls out.

6 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    Is that for real?

    identicon
    sxmont, Dec 29th, 2005 @ 4:33am

    I would love to be apart of that IT firm that is "scamming" the government over there. I do not the details of the problems or of the job, but 2010 is a ways away. It really should not take that long. It is amazing how people really do not understand technology yet.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    They mysteries of XML

    identicon
    coglethorpe, Dec 29th, 2005 @ 6:11am


    Haven't these people heard of XML? Good grief, I do think I could assemble a team of my geek friends to do the job. I'd only charge them 289 million and have it done by mid 2009. :-)

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Re: They mysteries of XML

    identicon
    Diego, Dec 29th, 2005 @ 6:31am

    I'll gather mine, $280 millions by 2008! hahaha

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    Five Years?

    identicon
    ZOMG CENSORED, Dec 29th, 2005 @ 6:38am

    Isn't it basically 2006 now?

    Also, you didn't really hit the full point that it will be out "progressively" (which I highly doubt will be as effective as intended) from 2007-2010.

    It's not really all that horrible, I find it a bit reasonable seeing as they entirely underestimated the time it would take.

    It's still not as acceptable as it should be, but there's some skewing going on. ;)

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  

    Technolgy bets that can't be backed up!!

    identicon
    Curtis Edenfield, Dec 29th, 2005 @ 6:55am

    Who's to blame here? The I.T. department for saying they could build a system that could solve the cops communication problems or the management for believing such a hair brianed scheme!! I've seen this first hand with a system that routes and tracks in realtime city transportation system. The biggest problem was the main city contributer bought one system and the bus operator contractor supported a different system. While both where similar, they weren't completely compatibal.

    Maybe we should work within the bounds of what's available and not what's going to be built.

    Cutting edge technolgy is exactly that, sometimes all the pieces don't work together as planned.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  

    Pork

    identicon
    Bob, Dec 30th, 2005 @ 4:48pm

    "However, taking five years seems a bit extreme."

    Not if you need to figure it out as you go.

    A $290 million giant slab of bacon. It must have been an amazingly slick negotiatior who got this pork barrel ramrodded through.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This