Mercedes Crashing Demo Was Faked... But Not To Crash
from the so-they-say dept
Remember a couple of weeks ago, when we had that story about the demonstration of Mercedes' new radar braking system that failed, causing a 3-car pileup? At the time, Mercedes blamed the steel warehouse they were in. However, it appears there's a bit more to the story. C. Bronte writes in to point out a followup story where it's revealed that Mercedes is now claiming they knew ahead of time it wouldn't work, and had told the TV reporters exactly that -- but the reporters still wanted to film it in that environment. So, they had planned to fake the entire thing, using drivers who would hit the brakes at the appropriate time. The problem was that, due to the smoke machine, the drivers couldn't see the cars in front of them. They tried to use a block of wood on the ground to mark where the drivers should stop, but (Mercedes claims...) the suspension on the car made it so the drivers didn't notice running over the wood, leading to the pileup. So, it was still an accident, but not so much due to a technology failure (that was expected), but due to human error. Who knows how true this is, or how much is simply Mercedes trying to spin the story in a more positive manner, but apparently the journalist who set this up has been fired.
3 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Brazen Scams By Engineers Uncovered
- DailyDirt: Making Foods Yucky...
- No Surprise: Scammers Focus On Tricking The French With False Three Strikes Infringement Notices
- Wall Street Journal Europe Doles Out Cash And Favors To Inflate Circulation Numbers
- Paul Ceglia To Facebook: I Didn't Forge A Contract, You Did!





Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
LIES
That sounds like hogwash... Oh, wait! I guess the VP from Sony works for Mercedes now and has decided that most people don't know what a wreck is...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
journalist?
the journalist who set this up has been fired
That last line is unclear to me. If you're working for Mercedes, you're not really a journalist. Did you mean publicist, perhaps?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: journalist?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment