And Then There Was One: Only One One-Click Patent

from the amazon-keeps-the-ring dept

Last year a company sued Amazon.com, claiming that Amazon's infamous one-click patent actually infringed on their own electronic transaction patent. A court has tossed out the suit, leaving Amazon.com as the one true holder of the one-click patent.

6 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    Am I the only one..

    identicon
    discojohnson, Nov 22nd, 2005 @ 6:47pm

    ..that has 0 trust in the patenting system? How can someone patent this idea? Can I patent shaking twice when a guy goes pee?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    Re: Am I the only one..

    identicon
    Jared Anderson, Nov 22nd, 2005 @ 7:03pm

    Yea this is crazy,"You cant have 1 click sales on your site cause we patented it."

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Re: Am I the only one..

    identicon
    nonuser, Nov 22nd, 2005 @ 7:22pm

    How about this workaround:

    [See who's a butthead and place my order]

    *click*

    Jeff Bezos is a butthead!

    [Place my order]

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    well...

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Nov 23rd, 2005 @ 10:27am

    granted i think the patent system is faulty for allowing this to be patented, but i think for the most part that amazon.com patented it just so no one can sue them later (though, i guess that didn't work that well). there are plenty of places that you really only need one click to buy (look at the iTunes music store). amazon.com has yet to sue someone for that.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  

    Re: well...

    icon
    Mike (profile), Nov 23rd, 2005 @ 10:41am

    amazon.com has yet to sue someone for that.

    Amazon Sues Barnes & Noble Over One-Click Patent (1999)

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  

    learn correct terminology

    identicon
    small guy, Nov 23rd, 2005 @ 5:06pm

    Mike, you are at it again...
    talking about patents and not knowing much about them...
    First, a patent cannot infringe on somebody else's patent: only product can infringe on a patent, so the patent holder can sue for patent infringement.
    There is a procedure called "interference", when two different patent applications claims the same subject matter. But this is all handled by the PTO: they are supposed to determine which patent is valid.
    Second, as much as I hate Amazon.com and their patents myself, believe me, 1-click patent is actually a *good* patent when you compare it to a typical patent issued to e.g. MicroShit...
    Yes, it is a *good* patent, despite all the hysteria. After all, Tim O'Reily issued an apology to Jeff Bezos for calling a boycott on amazon.com when the prior art search bounty failed to produce anything of importance...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This