Asking For A Customer Review? Patented

from the yay-patent-office dept

Amazon has added to their stable of patents-that-should-never-have-been-granted with three patents that could potentially spell trouble for lots of companies. They've patented asking for customer reviews, searching across multiple categories and community based recommendations. That last one fits nicely with another patent they already have on their Purchase Circles offering. For the most part, Amazon has been known for getting these types of patents more for defensive, rather than offensive purposes -- but it should raise plenty of questions about why these types of patents deserved to be granted in the first place. How much money was wasted applying for them that could have gone towards real innovation? I'd ask you for your review of this post, but Amazon could sue me.

5 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    enough is enough

    identicon
    Justin R, Nov 11th, 2005 @ 10:22am

    The entire Patent and Copyright systems need to be smashed. It's out of hand what these criminals are getting away with.

    I am tired of my tax and consumer dollars being wasted on patents that should never have been granted. Just as I am tired of being made to feel paying someone for some words over instruments is a privalige and that I'm a criminal suspect for wanting to play it on whatever device I choose to.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    Re: enough is enough

    identicon
    re, Nov 11th, 2005 @ 11:11am

    You think that's crazy? check this out...

    from: http://www.techworld.com/applications/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1665

    Microsoft has been granted a patent for "Time-based hardware button for application launch". To you and me, the mouse double-click.

    US patent 6,727,830, filed 12 July 2002 and granted 27 April this year, is described: "A method and system are provided for extending the functionality of application buttons on a limited resource computing device."


    so yeah... they pattented the double click.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Re: enough is enough

    icon
    Mike (profile), Nov 11th, 2005 @ 11:30am

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    ignore

    identicon
    SV, Nov 11th, 2005 @ 1:36pm

    Some countries started producing bird flu medicines although it's patented and they've not obtained patent rights, proceeded anyway to save lives.

    Next step is that people should just stop respecting ridiculous patents and go on with their job.

    If everybody did it, the system would die.

    Am I anarchyst or whatever? Call me that.. but this entire situation is becoming ridiculous.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  

    This has got to stop...

    identicon
    Mark, Nov 11th, 2005 @ 2:36pm

    How can this be patentable? Do the people in the patent offices not live in the same world? You can go to any number of web sites and see the things these patents are for. This is a joke? So much for innovation. A aptent should protect a real, new innovative idea from being used straight away by other people. If someone spends time and resources on a really, truely new idea, then a patent is a great way to get rewards for it. Patenting ideas that are quite obvious and not at all new is unbelievable. Why isn't anything being done about this?!? Yeah, i know... no one with enough clout cares enough.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This