Vendors Agree On Definition Of Spyware Without Disintegrating
from the yes,-but-does-it-help-at-all? dept
While the last "industry coalition" of anti-spyware vendors fell apart when they opened their doors to certain adware vendors, the latest coalition promised they would be much more effective -- by setting pretty limited goals. To start with, they said they needed to define spyware -- and now they claim they've succeeded. They've come out with what they hope is a decent set of guidelines that distinguishes the worst kinds of malware from the not-so-bad kind. It's not clear, from the description, how useful these guidelines really are. It took them five months to basically say surreptitious installs are really bad and tracking cookies aren't quite so bad. That was pretty clear before -- so it'll be interesting to see what the various anti-spyware firms actually do with these guidelines, and if it makes any kind of a difference.
1 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Cybersecurity Bill Backers Insist This Isn't SOPA... But Is It Needed?
- If The RIAA Wants To Talk About Misinformation Campaigns, Let's Start With The RIAA's Misinformation Campaign
- UK Report Blames The Internet For Terrorism, Says ISPs Should Take Down Content
- NY Times: RIAA & MPAA Exaggerate Piracy Impact Stats... But We're Going To Assume They're True Anyway
- Author Jonathan Franzen Thinks That Ebooks Mean The World Will No Longer Work





Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Link for Public Comments
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment