Predictions

Predictions

by Mike Masnick




The Death Of Line Sharing... Leads To The Rise Of Unintended Consequences

from the that-didn't-take-long-at-all dept

As the courts and the FCC have basically killed off any mandated line sharing by the big telcos and cable companies, the firms that lived off line sharing knew they were in trouble. While some thought the new rules would be the near immediate death of some of these providers, others (including the FCC) hoped that it would spur them to look into alternative technologies, such as wireless. It didn't take long at all for that to happen. Yesterday we pointed out that Earthlink is actively trying to push into the muni-WiFi space and today comes the news that Covad is buying a fixed wireless ISP -- coming just days after it was rumored that they're going to launch a fixed wireless solution in San Francisco. While it remains to be seen if these companies will really be able to make these wide area wireless solutions work on a widespread basis (and there are some big challenges there), it's amusing to think that they're quickly becoming thorns in the side of incumbent telcos. It was the incumbents, after all, who fought so hard to end the line sharing rules -- and the end result is they've potentially turned their partners into much more threatening competitors.

13 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    Oct 5th, 2005 @ 8:19am
  • Gov Regulations

    This is a good example of why government regulation just tends to mess things up. If the free-market is allowed to take its course, everyone (except the gov bureaucrats) is happier.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Oct 5th, 2005 @ 12:36pm
    • Re: Gov Regulations

      We operate a community wireless network covering the largest area in the UK - started because the incumbent monopoly BT couldn't be bothered with what they considered to be a small phone exchange. Just goes to show what the locals can do even if there are no telcos prepared to do so!

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Oct 5th, 2005 @ 3:27pm
    • Re: Gov Regulations

      by craig

      without government regulation there would be no internet.
      Don't understand what I mean? LEARN. Start your research in the late 1960s and the Southern Pacific Railroad.

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    Oct 5th, 2005 @ 8:38am
  • Beware Earthlink

    by Anonymous

    Before you use Earthlink, you may want to note founder and board member Sky Dayton's connections with Scientology, and the practices of Scientology against its critics.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Oct 5th, 2005 @ 8:46am
    • Re: Beware Earthlink

      by Solarcanine

      ...and you expect Earthlink to start sending out commando squads to keep their Authorized Use Policy secret from the non-believers?

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      • Oct 5th, 2005 @ 9:40am
      • Re: Beware Earthlink

        by Anonymous

        No, but I hardly trust Earthlink to not monitor and use to their advantage the communication of anyone that is considered a critic of Scientology. Take a look at "xenu.net" and read about the "Fair Game" practice of Scientology. I wouldn't trust anyone in that organization to handle my data.

        (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      Oct 5th, 2005 @ 9:47am
    • Re: Beware Earthlink

      by Anonymous Coward

      O h p l e a s e.

      Sky Dayton has nothing to do with the company and has not for years. and who cares what he does anyway?

      Should we care about anyone's "religion"? I'm not religious and I just do not care.

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      • Oct 5th, 2005 @ 10:08am
      • Re: Beware Earthlink

        by Wade

        I care. Those who will not blindly line the coffers of an ethically bereft organization care. Thanks for pointing out that potential Scientology connection.

        Frankly, I don't see what the stance is of this blurb's author. Are you chastizing the telcoms for fighting to have their property rights recognized?

        (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      • Oct 5th, 2005 @ 10:09am
      • Re: Beware Earthlink

        by Anonymous

        Sky Dayton is still on the board of directors, and Scientology is unlike any other religion. Educate yourself at xenu.net.

        Those are facts.

        (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

        • Oct 5th, 2005 @ 10:20am
        • Re: Beware Earthlink

          by Anonymous Coward

          OMG! Anyone can say anything about anyone and it is believeable. Remember the Jews, the Native Americans, the dare i say, blacks... Pleade people get a clue. There are no conspiracies, no one trying to to manipulate you while you watch TV, oh wait, that one is true, sorry.

          Hey, send me your name and let me start a website to tell the world what a dolt you are...

          sheesh, who pissed in my wheaties this morning...


          (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      Oct 5th, 2005 @ 1:32pm
    • Re: Beware Earthlink

      by Hunding

      OMG you have got to be kidding me. You would not use a compnay because one of the board members has a differnt religion than you? WOW, I sure as hell hope you are a skin head, and if your not, please someone get some combat boots on this nazi!
      Opinions like that are the reason Americans are in so much trouble today in the rest of the world! Ignorance is bliss!

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      • Oct 5th, 2005 @ 3:06pm
      • Re: Beware Earthlink

        by Anonymous of Course

        Hah! Ignorance is not knowing the amazing story of Jack Parsons, his relationship with R L. Hubbard and
        Alistar Crowley. It's stranger than fiction and bares the roots of scientology- which is science fiction. Really, Google Jack Parsons and enjoy.

        That said, any relationship between one of Earthlink's founders and scientology wouldn't stop me from using it's services.

        (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It