Spam Filtering Breaking Down? Doesn't Seem Like It

from the nice-try dept

Like most folks who have been online for many years, I get my fair share of spam. However, with a combination of filters, it's totally manageable. So, it seemed a bit surprising to see a claim in Computerworld that spam filters were nearing "a breakdown." Of course, then you read the fine print and realize that this is a press release dressed up to look like an article and the "expert" is simply someone trying to sell his own challenge-response system, which has its own problems (basically, challenge response works by marking nearly everything as spam -- thus creating a huge number of false positives, and annoying everyone who tries to email you). Even worse, the guy doesn't actually present any real evidence that filters are breaking at all. He just says they are, and claims that if you get 30 spam messages, then your spam filters aren't effective. Ok. Well, then my spam filters are very effective. While they catch about 1,000 spam messages, I only get one or two a day in my inbox. Seems like a long way from breaking. Maybe this guy just needs a more effective spam filter.

1 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    No Subject Given

    identicon
    Tim, Sep 14th, 2005 @ 5:40am

    Sounds like http://www.pearlgates.net/nanae/kooks/alanconnor.shtml should be required reading ;)

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This