Wal-Mart Jumps Into The Copyright Question Concerning Photo Reprinting

from the orphan-works,-indeed dept

Earlier this year, there was a lot of talk following a few news stories about various photo processing locations that were refusing to make prints of photos that "looked too good" for fear that they could be violating copyright. It was a silly situation, where people couldn't get new prints made of their own photos if they happened to have actually taken a decent shot. Well, now, it appears that Wal-Mart is trying to do something about that (if ever so slightly). They're taking part in a discussion about how "orphan works" should be dealt with. These are works where the owner of the copyright is unknown or unreachable. Wal-Mart is saying that this could apply to certain photographs as well -- and if the law is changed, it could allow them to more easily print such photos without fear of breaking copyright law.

4 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    Mad Skillz

    identicon
    DGK12, Sep 7th, 2005 @ 1:25pm

    It was bound to happen. Why in modern times a person mustn't think or be capable in any palpable manor.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    Ask for a release form

    identicon
    Eponymous Cowherd, Sep 7th, 2005 @ 1:52pm

    The procedure is to ask for the manager and then ask for a release form, indicating that you release W*M from liability. Or use CostCo or one of the online services where they don't question your honesty.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Re: Ask for a release form

    identicon
    Anonymous, Sep 7th, 2005 @ 6:41pm

    The problem is that W*M's policy in regards to releases are that they do not protect them from a (c) holder's legal recourse. And it has happened when down-on-their-finances photographers have entrapped and successfully sued places like W*M for (c) reproduction. Just a thought.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    more of blaming the tool and not who wields it.

    identicon
    Anonymous of Course, Sep 8th, 2005 @ 12:12pm

    Walmart and the photo copying centers are on the wrong track. The copyright liability should be on the person requesting the copy. You don't blame a copier machine for an illegal copy. These photocopy centers are much like a copier machine but with a (sometimes) better user interface. The person operating the machinery should carry no responsibilty for anything but a good quality copy.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This