RSS
Reducing Your Book Buying To Statistically Ridiculous Triviality
from the how-many-words-per-dollar-is-that? dept
Earlier this year, Amazon.com got some press for revealing their "text stats" with "statistically improbably phrases," listing out phrases that tend to only appear in that particular book. There were other stats as well -- and all were about equally as useless. It appears that the Washington Post has just discovered these silly stats and has written up an amusing article noting some of the completely useless and trivial stats you can now compare different books over. They really seem to like the "words per dollar" feature, for instance. "But in its pure form, Text Stats is a triumph of trivialization.... Now you too can sound like a literary insider at Washington cocktail parties. You can throw around statistics and make clever conversation about the hard history books, the long-winded novels, even those thick, heavy, make-you-think philosophy tomes that contain really, really long words. And the beauty of it is, with Amazon's "Search Inside" Text Stats and other features, you won't even have to read them."
4 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- BBC Tracks Down And Confronts An Internet Troll
- More Details About Paramount's Offer To Law Schools To Teach Them About The Evils Of 'Content Theft'
- DailyDirt: Sneaky Little Spiders
- Can We Count The Ways In Which Lowe's 'License Agreement' For Linking To Its Site Is Insane?
- NBCUniversal Pirates NBCUniversal SNL Skit That NBCUniversal Refuses To Put Online
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
But can it do Type I Nested F-tests?
It might be fun to perform a principal components analysis (PCA) on a book, to find eigenvectors of words that describe a typical page. What if every page in a book is merely a linear combination of eigenvectors? It would probably work really well for Techdirt, with its predictable anti-recording-industry postings, free market dogma, and anti-dorpus rants.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
SIPs and search
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
how ironic
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: how ironic
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment