Porn Publisher Mistakenly Goes After Google Again

from the wrong-target... dept

A publisher of adult magazines is making some news today for asking the court to bar Google from displaying certain images they own the copyright to. This is a followup to the case they filed last year and a similar case they've filed against Amazon. However, it's the wrong target. They're going after Google (and Amazon) because they have money -- but they're not the ones infringing on the publisher's copyright. The lawsuit is because some other porn websites have copied photos that are owned by this publisher and posted them to the web for free. Google and Amazon's A9 (and just about any other image search engine) are indexing these sites and so the images show up on certain searches. The people who are infringing are the sites who have posted the photos -- but they don't have money, so the publisher is just suing Google and Amazon and demanding they not show these photos at all. That's pretty difficult as it's not like someone at these companies reviews all the photos their crawler finds before they show up in the index. Besides, if the publisher wins this case, it immediately opens up a new business model for sneaky publishers: (1) just get others to copy your content (2) sue Google/Amazon/Yahoo/Microsoft (3) profit!

6 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    No Subject Given

    identicon
    Bob3000, Aug 25th, 2005 @ 11:10am

    Frist!!!!1!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    Re: No Subject Given

    identicon
    st23am, Aug 25th, 2005 @ 11:26am

    And your the only one! .... wait DOH!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Everything on Google Infringes

    identicon
    chronicon, Aug 25th, 2005 @ 11:32am

    Ha! This is such a joke since everything Google or any other search engine indexes is copyrighted (unless it's public domain). If Google were to protest this by going black for a day the screams would be deafening!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    No Subject Given

    identicon
    Ivan Sick, Aug 25th, 2005 @ 8:07pm

    Why don't these idiot porn sites just watermark their images, as so many other sites do? If those ebaums idiots can do it surely they can too. "Oh no! We don't want free advertising!!"

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  

    No Subject Given

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 26th, 2005 @ 12:53pm

    Anyone got pics? Plz post!!!!1111one!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Gabbi, Apr 3rd, 2006 @ 3:59pm

    thank you

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This