Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   No Subject Given

   

   Jimmy Thomas, Aug 25th, 2005 @ 6:49am

   
   

   *takes a pic of this article*
   
   ha ha haaa! my evil plan to fill the worlds storage devices with useless pictures continues!!
   
   
   No, but really... I didn't know that. I usually have trouble *keeping* my photos around.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   Meow meow

   

   dorpus, Aug 25th, 2005 @ 7:10am

   
   

   Don't you keep pictures of your baby daughter?
   

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3.  

   guilty

   

   Anonymous Coward, Aug 25th, 2005 @ 7:44am

   
   

   I'm one of those people who can't seem to delete pics. A weekend visiting the family (incl the new nephew) means 300-400 pics on my 4mp cam, about 40 of which will later be pulled and passed around.
   But the other 300 still sit in my .../pics/2005/07/pics-2005-07-tripHome directory. No one will ever see them, but I know they're there. I changed my habits from a careful and savage pruner after I deleted a few pictures of my cousin that weren't exactly perfect, and he died in a plane crash before I saw him again.
   So I'm crazy.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4.  

   Re: Meow meow

   

   Anonymous of Course, Aug 25th, 2005 @ 7:53am

   
   

   I bought a 256Mb jump drive at Wal-Mart. When I got home I noticed the package had been neatly slit along the bottom. It was a used item that had been restocked. I was a little miffed but decided that if it worked I would keep it anyway. I was in a rush hence the trip to wally-world. When I installed the drive I discovered, Lo and Behold! It was filled with baby photos. I guess someone needed to transfer some photos and then didn't have any use for the drive and returned. I'm a packrat photographer... just bought a 160G drive just for photo storage. With each photo running ~22Mb it's really not as much storage as you might think.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

5.  

   Picture Hosting Sites

   

   Matt, Aug 25th, 2005 @ 8:36am

   
   

   With picture hosting sites that have damn near unlimited photo capacity, it's a wonder why people use their own hard drives for this in the first place!
   
   Sites like fotki and things like that...replace any need to keep it on your hard drive...and anyone taking higher than 6 megapixel shots to send to family is a bit over-done. Do they really need a 2048x1600 size photo(5 megapixel)? You can't print em that large or even view em that large on most computers without shrinking them!

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

6.  

   Re: Picture Hosting Sites

   

   spam, Aug 25th, 2005 @ 8:58am

   
   

   My god, what a *terrible* idea. One of those 'free' photo hosting sites (I forgot which one) royally screwed over customers not too long ago.. they either went under, or started charging for space.. something pretty lame.
   
   It's best to store your photos yourself. Just make sure that you back them up.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

7.  

   Re: Meow meow

   

   generator, Aug 25th, 2005 @ 9:34am

   
   

   ...but the question is, did you KEEP the baby pictures?

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

8.  

   Ya, I keep em.

   

   Photoman, Aug 25th, 2005 @ 9:35am

   
   

   I'm a photographer, my wife is a graphic designer. Even before the digital revolution, we kept everything. You never know when that bad shot you took might actually be useful sometime down the road..

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

9.  

   Keeping images isn't necessarily bad...

   

   Anonymous Coward, Aug 25th, 2005 @ 10:15am

   
   

   It's not as simple as this headline makes it sound. I do keep almost all of the pictures I take because at some point in the future I'll re-review the photos. Typically, there will be a shot I would have 'chimped'(aka deleted), that now has an appropriate use. Had I deleted that photo, the opportunity to make use of it at a later date would never have materialized. If your a pro, chimping will end up costing you money down the road - not to mention that deleting images in-camera at an event takes your attention away from the action.
   
   It's just better to just keep them all if you have the storage space.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

10.  

    keeping them is the easy part...

    

    Dave, Aug 25th, 2005 @ 10:36am

    
    

    I've found that keeping my photos is the easy part. I'll take a picture and upload it to my computer. then, I'll photoshop-it-up so that it looks normal (keeping original size). Then I'll make a special-size photo for my website (~800x600). Sometimes we email out pictures to the family so we make another special-size photo that's even smaller than that (~500x300). Before long, I'll have anywhere from 1 to 5 versions of the same picture!
    So, what kind of tool is best to maintain such a large collection of pictures? Right now I use Picassa, but is there something out there that basically offers the same kind of features and can help me effectively store my pictures?
    

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

11.  

    Re: keeping them is the easy part...

    

    Anonymous, Aug 25th, 2005 @ 11:07am

    
    

    Keep them all! Spare your relatives... only slide show the best.
    
    To repeat the question above: What's the best workflow/organizing tool for the "best" subset?

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

12.  

    Weird

    

    Anonymous Coward, Aug 25th, 2005 @ 4:30pm

    
    

    I have no problem deleting crappy photos. Back when I used film I would throw out any photos that didn't turn out. I don't need to see 5 versions of the same scene/event, so I just pick the best ones.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

13.  

    How to deal with them all.

    

    Rob Kohr, Aug 26th, 2005 @ 8:51am

    
    

    1) I usually fill up my camera for an event then dump all of the images into one album.
    
    2) Then, pull out the top 15 and only that many and add it to another album.
    
    You can keep all the crap, but those 15 are enough for any one event, and also it happens to be the limit of the attention span of anyone looking a a photo album.
    

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

14.  

    can't delete photos

    

    jim mann, Jul 20th, 2006 @ 10:35am

    
    

    i have adobe starter album 3. my pc seems to keep everything i have looked at. i can't seem to delete photos. they are many still there after i delete them.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

15.  

    can't delete pics

    

    jim mann, Jul 20th, 2006 @ 6:35pm

    
    

    forget no 14. i deleted adobe photoshop from my pc.
    could not permanently delete various pics from internet or downloaded pics from internet. works fine now. seems like anything that was pulled up was randomly kept and unable to be taken out permanently.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

16.  

    can't delete pics

    

    jim mann, Jul 21st, 2006 @ 7:09pm

    
    

    no. see 14 and 15, pics are still there. i delete them but they are not gone!

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

17.  

    

    Anonymous Coward, Jul 22nd, 2006 @ 5:24am

    
    

    any image seen on internet or pics downloaded either.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment