Scientologists Recognize Inevitability Of Losing Links Case

from the whoops dept

Just a day before the Dutch Supreme Court was supposed to weigh in on whether Scientologists could get someone on copyright infringement just for linking to content they didn't want online, it appears someone explained to them how unlikely this case was to succeed -- so they're trying to drop it completely. However, the person accused of putting up the links is pushing for the case to continue. It would be good to have yet another confirmation that linking to content is not the same as hosting it yourself. In the meantime, this is yet another example of the Streisand Effect, where simply trying to make something online disappear has only succeeded in getting it that much more attention.

2 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    Unwanted attention

    identicon
    eskayp, Jul 8th, 2005 @ 3:54pm

    Recently scientology derived its own version of the 'Streisand Effect'.
    Scientologists now have their own proprietary 'Tom Cruz Effect'.
    It's based on the realization that 'truth' is like a brick
    and that half a brick can be thrown twice as far.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    I think it's fair to say...

    identicon
    nonuser, Jul 8th, 2005 @ 5:56pm

    that since Kirstie Alley first became involved with Scientology, she has gained a great deal.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This