iCon Plagiarized?

from the and-so-it-goes dept

Last month there was some talk about Steve Jobs bizarre over-reaction to an unauthorized biography, that wasn't actually that unkind to him (leading some to think it was all a strategy to boost sales of the book). Still, the Guardian Online's blog points out that the author of a previous unauthorized biography is accusing the author of the latest book of lifting large sections of his book, and maybe shifting the words around slightly. While it does sound like the new author should have credited the earlier book for large sections, it reminds me of the recent discussion by Malcolm Gladwell when he discovered someone taking large portions of an article he wrote and using them in a play. It raises a lot of questions about intellectual property, and how people "build" on the work of others. That's not to say plagiarism is okay -- but the issue isn't always as simple as it seems.

1 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    Cite Cite Cite

    identicon
    Scott, May 26th, 2005 @ 9:58am

    People should always cite their sources. Unless you are saying something like, "I talked to [so-and-so] and they told me that..." then you need to say where you found the information.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This