It's All Just Messaging

from the calm-down... dept

Tomi Ahonen has a lot of really interesting things to say about the mobile space. When he talks, it's usually worth paying attention, as he's been studying the space for many years, and usually has great insights into what's really happening in the mobile space. Andrew Odlyzko is another sharp thinker in the technology space, who not only was one of the only people who noticed that Worldcom and other telcos were lying about claims they were making way before anyone else did, but also recognized that connectivity is more important than content and has made other interesting points concerning the growth of the internet. So, when Ahonen dismisses Odlyzko as a "clueless American analyst," something doesn't seem right. In this case, though, it seems like Ahonen has become a little too focused on trashing "clueless Americans" than with the actual issue. His entire rant is about how mobile email won't be the killer app for mobile devices. He might be right... but discussions about what will and won't be "the killer app" are usually pretty pointless. Ahonen, however, gets incredibly focused on what seems like a silly debate over "who will win: SMS or mobile email." All of these "which technology will win" debates tend to miss the point -- which is that technologies evolve and change to handle what people need them to do. Both SMS and email are simply different forms of messaging and each have advantages and disadvantages, depending on the situation. The "advantages" that Ahonen lists concerning SMS don't actually seem that advantageous in some situations. He claims that SMS always beats email because the other person is always there. That's nice in some situations, but it also means more interruptions -- which may not be ideal for certain forms of communication. Also, his claim that kids are using SMS text messaging rather than Blackberries is a bit misleading. The Blackberry isn't marketed to kids. So, what they have available to them is a phone with text messaging, so of course they're more likely to use that than mobile email. While it's true that mobile email may not be "the killer app" for mobile devices (but who really cares?), trashing anyone who says that mobile email is a useful application seems to be going a bit overboard as well. As noted, Ahonen is usually very sharp, and worth paying attention to, but this time, it seems he over reacted a bit. Update: Tomi responds in the comments and admits he may have gone a bit overboard. He's edited the post so as to no longer call Odlyzko clueless and explains his position more fully.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Tomi T Ahonen, May 16th, 2005 @ 1:45am

    PS I apologize to Andrew, didn't mean to suggest h

    PS Thank you Techdirt for pointing out a clear error in what I intended to say.

    I re-read my posting and noticed that I did assign the "clueless" accusation accidentially to the wrong person. Obviously the Economist made no mention of Andrew Odlyzko commenting on e-mail for mobile, and thus it was wrong for me to suggest he would be clueless. I really did mean to say the (unnamed) journalist making the wrong conclusions was clueless. I have corrected my posting at Ecademy and also apologized to Andrew there.

    Tomi Ahonen :-)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    sprearson81 (profile), Jun 8th, 2012 @ 6:23pm

    Indeed, thank you techdirt !

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This