Main Promoter Of Utah's Anti-Porn Law Stands To Profit From The Law

from the surprise,-surprise dept

Is it any surprise that one of the biggest backers of Utah's overreaching and misguided anti-porn law actually is likely to profit tremendously from the law? It turns out that one of the main supporters of the bill just happens to run a company that sells web porn filters. The law, if you don't remember, requires ISPs to block access to a specific list of sites. In other words, those ISPs need filters. While the guy in question says his filters are for home use, not ISPs, apparently no one told others at the firm -- because sales people from the firm have approached ISPs since the law was passed. Of course, either way, this law is quite problematic. It isn't the ISPs who have done anything wrong, but the sites hosting the content. Utah should go after those sites -- not the ISPs. Since a similar law in Pennsylvania was tossed out by the courts, it's likely that this law will be facing quite a battle. In the meantime, though, it's biggest supporter will keep on selling software in support of the law.

4 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    What about Newsgroups?

    identicon
    No Porn Boy, Apr 20th, 2005 @ 4:02am

    The worst porn out there is not on websites, but in newsgroups. This is where cops routinely find child pornography.

    These are not websites in far off lands, these are pictures posted to newsgroups which are stored locally on the ISP's servers. If the ISP will not discriminate in what files they store on their own servers, then they need to be slapped.

    Millions of women and children are exploited by this barbaric and sick industry. Perpetrators need to be brought to justice.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    Who decides what's "obscene"?

    identicon
    crystalattice, Apr 20th, 2005 @ 5:19am

    These filters have to have someone looking at web sites and deciding what's obscene, right? So who are the people looking at these sites? Certainly not anyone affiliated w/ EFF, ACLU, or any other 1st Amendment loving group.

    One of the worst filter programs I've read about is BSafe (www.bsafe.com). This thing is pushed by the ultra-conservative right wing (you can see it on the opening page) and filters info that could be extremely useful to people, including terrorist info, health sites, dating sites, etc. I find people that filter crap because of a personal agenda offensive.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Re: Who decides what's "obscene"?

    identicon
    Beck, Apr 20th, 2005 @ 11:04am

    I think we should decide. Utah should send us the list of blocked sites so we can review the sites and confirm that they should be blocked.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    Re: What about Newsgroups?

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 21st, 2005 @ 12:20am

    Yes and a lot of sex crimes are done in hotel/motel rooms! Hotels should be responsible for checking what’s going on in their rooms!! Install cameras in every room and bathroom and employ highly trained personal to catch it before it happens!! (forget about the 99% normal people, and pushing rates way up.

    BILLIONS of men woman and children are exploited by extremists and the sick industry that tries to keep all things 'clean' and slap laws around in an attempt to stop this sort of stuff.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This