AOL's Blockage Of Phishing Sites... Hype Or Helpful?
from the nice-try dept
AOL is likely to get a ton of coverage for their announcement that they're going to start blocking phishing sites -- but how helpful will it really be? Already, most phishing sites don't stay online very long, as their hosts are quickly forced to take them offline. So, all AOL is doing is speeding up the process by a tiny amount. The sites will still be up for a while before AOL catches on and decides to block them. Besides, you always have to wonder about what happens when an ISP starts blocking sites without the user's ability to override. What will happen when a user wants to go to a specific site that AOL has blocked off? Will that user have a way around the blockage? Will site owners who are blocked have an appeal process if they feel the blockade is uncalled for? It's good that AOL is doing something, but claiming an ability to block phishing sites is both misleading and potentially risky. It could also open up some liability for AOL if users get to a phishing site AOL didn't block. Since AOL claims they will block these sites, will a user who gets phished be able to sue AOL for not living up to their promise to block those sites?
1 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Cybersecurity Bill Backers Insist This Isn't SOPA... But Is It Needed?
- If The RIAA Wants To Talk About Misinformation Campaigns, Let's Start With The RIAA's Misinformation Campaign
- UK Report Blames The Internet For Terrorism, Says ISPs Should Take Down Content
- NY Times: RIAA & MPAA Exaggerate Piracy Impact Stats... But We're Going To Assume They're True Anyway
- Author Jonathan Franzen Thinks That Ebooks Mean The World Will No Longer Work





Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
This will make some sites admin's actually do some
Imagine people who have web sites on ISPs who host phishing sites. They'll have the same problem but won't have a place to complain.
Let the games begin...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment