Misunderstanding Trademarks: American Blinds Suit Against Google Moves Forward

from the not-this-again dept

It seems that this issue isn't going to die any time soon. While one court has said that Google didn't do anything wrong to Geico in allowing companies to sell ads based on the keyword Geico (something that Geico is still fighting), another one has denied Google's request to dismiss an almost identical case from American Blinds. There are two issues here, and both of them should end up in Google's favor. First, this is simply not a violation of trademark. The purpose of trademark law is not that you have total control over your trademark -- just that others cannot use it in a way that confuses people into believing that they are you or acting on your behalf. Throwing up ads based on keywords is a situation where people know that these are competitive ads. It's like saying that Coke could never use the word Pepsi in one of their ads. Second, even if these ads did violate trademark law, it would not be Google's fault. Google did not place the ad. It would be the fault of the person or company that placed the ad. On both fronts, Google should have a very strong claim against American Blinds, but apparently it wasn't enough for a summary judgment. As John Battelle points out, if the court eventually does decide to misunderstand the purpose of trademark law (a la the French), this could end up at the Supreme Court to settle the differences in lower court rulings. Of course, the question now is whether or not Dave Pell will be buying Google ads on the phrase "American Blinds."


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Raymond Chen, Mar 31st, 2005 @ 2:26pm

    When I go to the grocery store

    and buy brand X granola bars, the register automatically prints a coupon for N cents off of brand Y granola bars. (Presumably the store has a higher margin on brand Y granola bars and therefore would prefer that I switch.) How is this different from what Google is doing?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    bob a louie, Nov 3rd, 2007 @ 11:45pm

    you don't get it, do you

    What you don't understand is that when you go to the market you get the coupon AFTER you make the purchase, not before.
    Google is diverting customers away from an intended vendor and that is what is wrong.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This