Why TV Providers Are Tying Up Condo And Apartment Complexes

from the this-again... dept

Earlier this month, we had a story about how cable providers were having a blast signing deals with new condo and apartment complexes which would force all residents to buy TV and broadband services from them -- even if they didn't use it or if they signed a deal with another provider. The NY Times has now written basically the same story, but has a little more analysis about why these sorts of deals have become so popular lately. The basic idea is that the market for pay-TV is saturated. Everyone who wants it, has it. So, rather than focus on creating better deals for customers (better prices, better services, etc...), the companies are looking for ways to force people to subscribe to their services. Apparently, they have no faith in their own ability to sell the service competitively.

6 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    It took cable _years_ to get into our complex

    identicon
    Michael Vilain, Mar 31st, 2005 @ 2:37am

    I've been here since 1989 and it was some years after that before the local cable co-op had service to our area. Then they were bought by AT&T and finally Comcast.

    Some our members are pissed that they can't get any sort of satillite TV because they're on the wrong side of the building (requiring connecting their dish on the roof, which is against the CC&R's).

    If only there were another alternative, but the local municiple fibre hook up is "just across the bridge" not 500 feet away.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    Re: It took cable _years_ to get into our complex

    identicon
    Daranthalis, Mar 31st, 2005 @ 5:36am

    Doesn't federal law mandate that you can put a small dish anywhere? I seem to recall that some cities with aggressively protected historic districts were very put out with this law some years ago.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Re: It took cable _years_ to get into our complex

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 31st, 2005 @ 7:25am

    Federal law only allows you to place an antenna (satellite or terrestrial) on property you own. If you neighbor's house block a satellite dish's view of the sky, you do not have the right to go and mount your dish on his house.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    Forced Cable

    identicon
    Bob Anderson, Mar 31st, 2005 @ 8:22am

    The building owners get free service in exchange for these contracts. The residents get a few dollars off of the "regular" rates, and the cable companies get exclusive rights to the building.
    Pretty sweet deal for everyone!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  

    He "hardly ever watches it"

    identicon
    DV Henkel-Wallace, Mar 31st, 2005 @ 10:29am

    At least he uses it once in a while. We don't even own a tv and it would really tick me off to have to pay for it.

    He complains anyway that there's nothing to watch. By the look of him, he should go running instead, killing two birds with one stone!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  

    Re: putting a dish up in condo complex

    identicon
    Michael Vilain, Mar 31st, 2005 @ 1:10pm

    Perhaps federal law does say this, but condo homeowners don't own the roof of the complex. That's "common area" and governed by the Homeowner's Association.

    We won't allow satillite dishes actually on the roof because they might damage it in a storm. Owners can hire a bonded, insured contractor to install a dish on the side of a fascia board in specific locations up there, but they can't go on the roof due to insurance issues. In the end, people on that side of the building either get cable or use an internal attena.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This