NY Times Still Trying To Equate Silicon Valley... >>
<< EBay Sellers Try To Get Moral Support For...
 tdicon 


Computers

by Mike Masnick

Mon, Mar 28th 2005 4:39am





How Many Appliances Do You Need?

from the excess-hardware dept

At the DEMO conference last month, it seemed like every company that wasn't pitching a blogging/RSS solution was selling some kind of "appliance" computer to stick in your rack. There was even one company selling a blogging appliance (hitting both hot trends in one shot). Basically, these appliances were simply taking software that the company wrote and putting it on a cheap computer. Every one of these appliances seemed to come in a different day-glo color, making you wonder if they all coordinated before hand, so that the fluorescent orange appliance didn't get confused with the pearly white one. It made some of the attendees wonder what sort of CIO wanted a rack full of these different appliances (no matter how colorful). However, some apparently believe that going the appliance route makes sense. It's not clear why, though. While the claim is ease of setup, it seems like it only makes things much more complex down the road. You suddenly have to manage ten different boxes when you could have done it just fine with one or two boxes and some software.

3 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    Appliances make sense

    identicon
    Jason Mac, Mar 28th, 2005 @ 6:08am

    I work for a large telco, and you need consider the red tape required in getting any product to production. In the case of an applinace, there is nothing to install, nothing to backup, no way that the operations team can "improve" the device. Any time the operations team needs to do something, we're talking huge dollars.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    No Subject Given

    identicon
    saleh, Mar 28th, 2005 @ 6:55am

    I consult to mid-size to large corporations (typically 10B+ revenue and 10K+ users) and many of them use an "appliance" approach anyway, especially the Microsoft shops.

    Even though you can run multiple server applications on a single box, that has the problems that (1) it is often difficult to establish troubleshooting demarcation, (2) especially on Windows, server applications don't always play well together, and (3) Windows' process scheduling is still awful, and a single CPU-bound process can affect every other application running on that box.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Halfway between appliance and single box....

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 28th, 2005 @ 9:28am

    ... and that's why software OS virtualization (when it works) is so useful. One physical box, but with separate OS images, potentially administrative domains, upgrade policies, etc.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


NY Times Still Trying To Equate Silicon Valley... >>
<< EBay Sellers Try To Get Moral Support For...
 tdicon 

A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss

Powered by Postrank

From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This