Defining Trade Secrets, Not Defining... >>
<< Just How Offensive Are Ringtones?
 tdicon 

Studies

by Mike Masnick

Thu, Mar 24th 2005 2:27am





Ok, Ok, We Get It: People Will Give Away Their Identity For Next To Nothing

from the another-one? dept

In the past, we've linked to a variety of studies showing that when offered some cheap trinket or nothing at all, people are often more than willing to give up their private info that can be used for identity theft. It seems the group doing this particular study likes to do it every single year, but with a different "prize." Not quite sure what it proves other than, yes, people are still giving away their info. Two years ago, it was a cheap ballpoint pen. Last year, they found that some chocolate would do the trick. This year, the winning entry is apparently a chance to win some theater tickets. Of course, they're all wasting their money. Another study last year found that you don't need to offer anything. You just ask people for their info and they'll give it to you.

2 Comments | Leave a Comment

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Armin, Mar 24th, 2005 @ 3:45am

    I think the prize is not the issue here...

    Did you really read the report? As far as I'm concerned the prize is fairly irrelevant here, it's the way the questions are disguised. Because of the way the questions were asked you only realise when you take a step back and look at the questions (and the data they reveal) in combination what the purpose might be.

    The social engineering and the means of cleverly disguising the real questions is the problem.

    I believe even a lot of security conscious people might have given away at least some sensitive information before realising what was really going on.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    Mike (profile), Mar 24th, 2005 @ 9:29am

    Re: I think the prize is not the issue here...

    Right... I was joking about the prizes. Obviously it's the questions that are the issue. My point was, we already know this. They show it every year, but make it seem different because there's a different prize.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Defining Trade Secrets, Not Defining... >>
<< Just How Offensive Are Ringtones?
 tdicon 
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
A word from our Sponsors...
Sponsored Resource
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat

A word from our Sponsors...
Recent Stories

Friday

8:40am: Another CA Cop Thinks A Cell Phone Might Be A Dangerous Weapon (15)
7:33am: RIAA: The Copyright Reform We Need Is To Make Everyone Else Copyright Cops (51)
5:36am: Ron Paul Doesn't Win RonPaul.com And Is Guilty Of Reverse Domain Hijacking (23)
3:31am: President Obama Is 'Troubled' About Chilling Effects His Own Administration Is Causing To Journalism? (42)

Thursday

11:20pm: Yet Another Anti-Patent Troll Bill Introduced In Congress (10)
8:19pm: District Attorney And Major TV Network Sued Over Stupid Reality Show (10)
5:00pm: DailyDirt: Tuition Debt Is For Chumps? (18)
4:01pm: Adam Savage On Why Copyright And Trademark Holders Need To Get Over Their Obsession With 'Control' (18)
3:01pm: Partisanship Over Spying On Journalists Is Stupid: Spying On Journalists Is Bad, Period (23)
2:00pm: Magic Hat Brewery Sues West Sixth Brewing, Claiming 6 Looks Too Much Like 9 (41)
More arrow
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This