eBay's Business Model Patent Mess Returns

from the online-auction-patent-is-baaaaaaaack dept

In 2002, someone who claimed he came up with the idea for online auctions and patented it before eBay existed sued the company for patent infringement. As we pointed out at the time, this was exactly what patents were not supposed to do. Here's a case where different people came up with similar ideas. One actually did something with it and built a real company, while the other didn't do anything with it at all, other than run to the patent office. Yet, the company that did something gets sued. That discourages companies from actually innovating. The companies that really do something open themselves up to lawsuits. While a court later tossed out the online auction patent for being too vague, they did award the guy nearly $30 million for his patent on "direct buying" online (yes, he actually patented that). Both sides appealed, and the court has found that, not only did eBay violate the direct buy patent, but it's bringing back the online auction patent as well, saying a lower court needs to check that out again.

2 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    Patents for the Little Guy

    identicon
    Ed, Mar 18th, 2005 @ 12:25am

    I believe that the intent of the patent process is to encourage innovation among even the small-time, independent inventors who don't necessarily have the means to bring something to market. In theory, at least -- in practice obviously there are a lot of problems with the system.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    Absurd

    identicon
    knight37, Mar 18th, 2005 @ 1:54pm

    This is absolutely absurd. How can you patent the idea of auctioning stuff online? That's just taking an existing idea - auctioning, which isn't patentable, and translating it to the internet. That's like amazon having a patent for selling books online or something. The whole patent law thing is a complete foobar. I can't believe we're letting this crap happen. Who pays for this in the end? That's right, the consumer. What will Ebay do if they are forced to pay this idiot? Just raise the price of their online auctions.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This