Legal Issues

Legal Issues

by Mike Masnick





Local Telco Pays Fine For Blocking Vonage

from the here's-a-slap-on-the-wrist dept

While some continue to worry about telcos harming independent VoIP providers, it looks like the FCC decided to take some action against the rural telcos blocking Vonage. It turns out that the telco in question was in North Carolina. The company has agreed to pay a $15,000 fine and agree not to block VoIP for 30 months. First of all, while it's nice to see a quick resolution, it's still not clear whether or not this telco actually violated any laws. The FCC still hasn't done anything about network neutrality -- so what did this telco actually violate? Second, assuming they did violate some rule, $15,000 certainly seems like a slap on the wrist. Finally, why ban them from blocking for only 30 months? If it's wrong, it's wrong. What happens 30 months from now when they start blocking again?

5 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. VOIP blockage

    by Paul E. McArdle - Mar 4th, 2005 @ 6:13am

    Is Time-Warner, in markets where its Road Runner
    ISP is selling internet- based local and long
    distance phone service, blocking competitors
    such as Skype?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  2. No Subject Given

    by Griffon - Mar 4th, 2005 @ 10:31am

    Mallik notes that it was not a fine but rather a "contribution" to the treasury department :p.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  3. No Subject Given

    by Nate - Mar 5th, 2005 @ 10:03am

    Still think it's absolutely ridiculous that Vonage (as well as the other parasitic VoIP offerings) fights tooth and nail to keep from being regulated as a phone company and then turn around and complain when someone blocks an IP port. Last time I checked IP was DATA, not VOICE. Madison was not blocking any voice phone calls at all, just particular data traffic on their own data network.

    Something about cake being eaten comes to mind

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  4. by Paul - Jun 9th, 2006 @ 6:45pm

    As a user it's my damned IP port not the telco's - to be used as I want so long as it does not harm others.
    These Telcos and CableCos do not have my interests at heart, video - voice - "data" all of it and stepping on it is WRONG.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  5. Re: VOIP blockage

    by eliot - Jun 22nd, 2006 @ 9:43pm

    I believe this is the case.
    We began having problems 4 months or 5 months after signing up with VoiceEclipse. We'd had no previous issues. Then suddenly - major latency.
    Causinging the phone not to ring - or to go straight to voice mail and other problems, as in unable to place calls (silence - no ring when dialed)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..
Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It