The Coming RSS Feed Licensing Mess

from the what-can-you-do? dept

With all the talk lately about what people can or can't do with other sites' content, it's only going to get more confusing. Steve Yelvington perfectly lays out the problem that a number of people have been coming to terms with. Once a site offers up an RSS feed, does that mean anyone can do anything with it? If not, how should they limit it? Some sites claim that feeds are only for "non-commercial" use, however that generally seems to assume that the feeds are there for people to put on their website for public display, rather than to use in an aggregator. Yelvington points out some different "licensing" policies that different RSS providers use, showing how confusing it can get. However, I think the problem may be even worse. Concerning the issue I laid out above... if a professional investor reads an RSS feed and makes a buy or sell decision based on that information, hasn't he used the RSS feed for commercial purposes? If a blogger who runs ads on his or her site, uses an RSS feed to find something useful to post to the blog, has he or she violated the non-commercial claim? Once again, the issue comes back to "control." Content providers need to learn to let go. Content users want to be free to do what they want with the content that's out there. That's what's so nice about RSS. Slapping silly, unenforceable regulations on it doesn't help your users, it just confuses them and makes them look elsewhere for content without restrictions.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Paul, Feb 28th, 2005 @ 5:35pm

    Same thing with ads

    Some who provide decent RSS feeds are now starting to put ads in them. While they have every "right" to do that, they just don't realize that many, many people will simply find alternate sources for their information.

    Our members aggregate all of their feeds into one place in Capango and can do things like group them together by topic and theme, with one "message" that contains multiple items. So we know what happens when some of the content providers start putting ads in their feeds - our members drop them like hot potatos and pick up other feeds. Those silly ad-hungry providers just can't figure out that they will lose in the end.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Danno, Feb 28th, 2005 @ 6:28pm

    Re: Same thing with ads

    Nah, ads don't bother me. I usually don't run adblockers (cept the popup kind), because, in my personal opinion, everyone's gotta make a buck and if I'm sucking down 20 megabytes a month from a guy, I'm willing to give his sponsor a chance to hawk their wares to me.

    Fair's fair.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Lorenzo, Mar 1st, 2005 @ 3:16am

    fair use

    well, RSS is a news format, so I assume we can extend to it the "fair use" principle that applies to news. If the owner of an RSS can t stand fair uses of his RSS, then simply he shouldn t have one, and should rather buy ads on other sites

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This