RSS
Why Mobile TV?
from the what's-the-benefit? dept
There are so many mobile TV efforts underway these days, that it seems odd that the real use case hasn't been outlined. A few months back, I wrote why it seemed unclear why mobile TV would be a very big market and now Mobile Pipeline has a similar article noting that mobile TV seems to fail on two criteria that seem to explain why mobile applications are successful. First, video isn't a mobile application. There doesn't seem to be a huge advantage to being mobile and watching video. This is especially true in an age of TiVo. Second, it doesn't fit with the device or the activity. Watching TV on a tiny screen doesn't seem all that appealing and it's difficult if not impossible to do while actually moving. The thing that has always struck me about mobile TV is that it really doesn't provide much that's new in a way that provides value. I don't need to watch TV now because my DVR is recording stuff back home. Also, if I'm out and about, I'm out and about doing something, not watching TV. Obviously, there are some cases where these faults don't necessarily apply -- such as commuting on public transportation, or viewing video in the backseat of a car. However, are those markets really so big as to justify some of the investments being made in mobile TV? Again, it always seems to come back to a single issue: mobile devices are primarily communications devices, not broadcast devices -- and most of the mobile TV efforts seem heavily focused on simply moving the TV broadcast experience to the phone -- which just doesn't seem that compelling.
I have a business...
The Talent Wars: Today's Toughest Startup Challenge
How To Successfully Get Your App Into China
I’m looking for policy...
Application Developers Alliance Applauds Schumer Plan To Introduce Patent Legislation
Policy Resources: Software Patents
I have an idea...
75 Questions To Help You Write An RFP For Website Design
Securing Venture Capital for that Next App Development
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
One Application
The difference with the new wireless mobile TV concept is that you would not be picking up over-the-air television signals, and I would guess that MLB, NFL etc will probably want to charge a fee for the ability to view the games.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
new usage patterns
Looked at from the viewpoint of "okay, so the tech has advanced enough so that the price has dropped" and "video is just another media type", combined with a smidgin of "service providers want you to pull traffic" and a heaping spoonful each of "recommendation systems let friends and agents shape your viewing" and "it's now trivially easy for individuals to create their own video content", and we're looking at totally different formats and packages for video content.
I want my pocket device smart enough to continually pull small content I might be interested in.
Regards,
John Dowdell
Macromedia Support
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
mobile tv
Sports, news and weather. Porn when the screen
is bigger :)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
watch where you're going
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Like some cheese whith that whine?
Me personally? If I had a cheap, and most importantly reliable mobile device I could watch TV on while on the bus I'd definitely use it, assuming it's not outrageously expensive.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment