Spammers Still Using Sender Authentication

from the so-why-aren't-people-stopping-them? dept

Last August, we noted that more spammers than legitimate users were using sender authentication systems. The latest report suggests that it's still being used in a wide variety of spam -- suggesting that it's really not doing very much good. Of course, the counter-argument is that this should let companies track down the spammers and stop them. However, there seems to be very little evidence that this is actually being done. In other words, for all the good sender authentication was supposed to do, it appears that very few are actually following through on the second part of the plan, which is dealing with "authenticated" spammers.

2 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    How can such systems be viable?

    identicon
    DV Henkel-Wallace, Feb 14th, 2005 @ 6:03am

    If I hijack a machine then I can identify all my spam as coming from the person whose machine has been hijacked (and can use his/her authenticated mail servers in the process -- no need for an open relay!). This has always seemed like a crucial flaw in all these systems, and is now starting to be exploited (I don't understand why it took so long).

    Sadly the only viable approaches seem to be to examine the spam messages themselves and to teach people not to respond.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    Re: How can such systems be viable?

    identicon
    Seth, Feb 14th, 2005 @ 8:24am

    Sadly the only viable approaches seem to be to examine the spam messages themselves and to teach people not to respond.

    You make a good point. Spam wouldn't exist if it wasn't profitable. If we spent as much time trying to get people to ignore/delete spam as we spend trying to stop it at the source, we'd probably be more successful at stoping it forever.

    It's the 5% of the population that responds to spam that are the reason it exists.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This