Did Norway Just Outlaw Google?

from the seems-like-it... dept

While no one will explain it this way, it certainly sounds like Norway just outlawed Google. What they actually did was fine a student who created a website that provided links to mp3 files that were hosted out on the web. The guy didn't host any of the music himself. He didn't even post the links himself, but let others submit links to the site. Basically, it was a directory/search engine for mp3 files. Creating a search engine that points to something illegal shouldn't be illegal by itself. If any crime is being committed, it's being committed by those who are hosting unauthorized files. I'm sure it wouldn't be too hard to use Google to find plenty of links to unauthorized mp3s, and it would seem that, following this ruling, Google would be liable for all of those links. The response, of course, is that this site was created solely for the purpose of finding mp3s. However, how hard is it to create a search query on Google that does the same thing, and then that page generated by Google has the same criteria?


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Mark Murphy, Jan 28th, 2005 @ 11:23am

    No Subject Given

    It added that the case was decided based on the responsibility for abetting an illegal act, and that Bruvik's actions were premeditated.

    A purely automated spider, like Google, would probably not be considered premeditated.

    That being said, it's a curious ruling.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    Mike (profile), Jan 28th, 2005 @ 11:40am

    Re: No Subject Given

    Hmmm... so would it be illegal to create a query on Google that found unauthorized mp3s?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Oliver Wendell Jones, Jan 28th, 2005 @ 1:17pm

    Re: No Subject Given

    so would it be illegal to create a query on Google that found unauthorized mp3s?

    No, but it would probably be illegal to link to it... ;-)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    John Dowdell, Jan 28th, 2005 @ 3:15pm

    No Subject Given

    "Aiding and abetting" has a long history. A fence could reasonably say "Well, *I* didn't steal it, so I must be innocent!"

    "Creating a search engine that points to something illegal shouldn't be illegal by itself." If you change the emphasis from "illegal thing" to "subverting a contract offered by a creator" -- from noun to verb -- then the landscape becomes a little clearer.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    nonuser, Jan 28th, 2005 @ 4:46pm

    that headline probably should've been

    "Norwegian court wants to throw Sergio Brin in jail"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This