RSS
Did A German Court Just Outlaw Spam Blocking?
from the wait-a-second... dept
A German court has apparently ruled that it is illegal to block email based on the content of the email. The reasoning, is that email is confidential, and any content-based filter is obviously "opening" a confidential message (which might sound similar to some early complaints about Gmail), thus breaking the law. The case itself is an interesting one, where a university decided (without telling anyone) that they would filter out any email that mentioned a fired employee. That seems to go above and beyond what's reasonable or smart (imagine when someone sends an email asking who is taking over the work of a fired employee, or referring to something that was done by that employee in the past) -- but should it be illegal? Either way, if the ruling stands, then it certainly sounds like most spam filters would suddenly become illegal in Germany.
2 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Leaked Memo Confirms Apple, Nokia & RIM Gave Indian Gov't Backdoors
- VW Will Block BlackBerry Email When People Are Off Work. Isn't That When It's Most Useful?
- Former Tunisian Regime Goes Beyond Spying On Internet Traffic... To Rewriting Emails & More
- Email Is 40 Years Old
- New US Postal Service Ad Campaign: Email Sucks, So Mail Stuff Instead
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Viruses?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
You are missing half of the facts and background
If you know someone who speaks German get him/her to translate it, possibly one of those online translators might give you a good enough translation as well. Here are three links with good summaries (in German):
http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/politik/0,1518,337177,00.html
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/m eldung/55201
http://www.heise.de/ct/03/26/186/
From a pure legal point of view spam filtering has always been illegal in Germany, same as the postman isn't allowed to throw away junk mail instead of delivering it.
But there are enough legal provisions for providers or companies to provide spam filters. E.g. they can make it part of the Ts&Cs of the contract that the customer signs. Also a lot of providers just quarantine spam, allowing the customer to review the spam if they so wish (who knows, someone might be interested in Viagra, Cialis or fake Rolexes?)
And finally no spammer will be able to claim a right of his spam to be delivered: For the simple reason that (unlike the US where you have to opt-out) Europe requires opt-in. Which the spammers will be struggling to prove.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment