Rumors, Conspiracies, etc.

Rumors, Conspiracies, etc.

by Mike Masnick




Microsoft Using Anti-Spyware App To Combat Unauthorized Windows Users?

from the sneaky,-sneaky... dept

Soon after Microsoft announced their new anti-spyware offering, I went to download it, and discovered (as everyone else has) that they confusingly hide the actual download behind a process designed to guarantee that you have an authorized version of Windows running. If you read the instructions carefully, you can get around actually running that check. While my version of Windows is perfectly legitimate, I saw no reason to tell Microsoft about it again and avoided the authorization check process. However, others are beginning to wonder why Microsoft is forcing people to prove they have a legitimate version of Windows just to download their anti-spyware application. After all, the whole reason Microsoft needs to offer this product is because they can't be bothered to actually fix some of their security holes. This sets up a weird set of incentives for Microsoft, whereby they might think they're better off pushing out buggy code, and then only allowing authorized users to patch it, as a way to catch those who are unauthorized. It seems unlikely that Microsoft would actually stoop this low, but there have to be better ways to work on getting more authorized copies of Windows out there.

11 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    Jan 17th, 2005 @ 1:28pm
  • No Subject Given

    by Anonymous Coward

    Resistance is futile you will be assimalated

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jan 17th, 2005 @ 2:36pm
  • Microsoft Using Anti-Spyware App To Combat Unautho

    by Brian Riley

    They instituted that change for ALL downloads from Microsoft Sites, except updates, over a month ago. They think it will cut down on the number of boot leg copies of windows in use. They are of course wrong.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jan 17th, 2005 @ 2:42pm
  • hmm, so the spammers could attack the upgrade

    by nonuser

    by creating a hidden dummy file called GenuineCheck.exe in the same directory that Microsoft uses, and setting its attributes to read-only. Or something

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Jul 27th, 2005 @ 2:23pm
    • Re: hmm, so the spammers could attack the upgrade

      by tim

      Hi,
      Where can I get a copy of genuinecheck.exe and anything I need to know about installing it?

      Tim

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      • Aug 2nd, 2005 @ 1:57pm
      • Re: hmm, so the spammers could attack the upgrade

        by Anonymous Coward

        Apparently there are a coupe of other workarounds to keep WGA at bay. Either you can paste “javascript:void(window.g_sDisableWGACheck=’all’) (no quotes) into the address bar of Internet Explorer before clicking the “Express” or “Custom” installs in the Automatic Update feature, or try opening IE, click Tools, Manage Addons, then select the ‘Addons that have been used by Internet Explorer’ option and disable the “Windows Product Advantage” addon. Both options have been tested and work, at least as of this post.
        it works

        (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    Jan 18th, 2005 @ 3:02am
  • ms spyware

    by Anonymous Coward


    so switch to osx. the latest mac mini makes it easier. thou if apple was REALLY aggressive, they would bundle migration tools to transfer your outlook/email & calendar stuff etc.

    if steve was serious bout poking billy in the eye, the mini would boot up, ask u to plug in the crossover cable & then migrate your shiat onto it. perhaps followed by a msg that says ring 1800-recycle to have your ex-x86-pc picked up & sent to some disadvantged christians in idaho or phuket.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jan 18th, 2005 @ 5:24am
  • Avoiding the check is needed

    by Anonymous Coward

    I wish MS would get rid of the check completely, but since it is something we need to live with I'm glad we can get around it.
    I don't use windows but I fix ALOT of windows machines. I do all of my downloads from OS X to avoid all of the nasties I clean on others computers.
    If MS forced verification, I would actually need to purchase windows just to download the app. I don't want to do that.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jan 18th, 2005 @ 9:45am
  • Big Deal

    However, others are beginning to wonder why Microsoft is forcing people to prove they have a legitimate version of Windows just to download their anti-spyware application.
    Wow, how awful. A company that may not want to give software to people who have stolen their product. Imagine that.

    If I stole a Ford, found out that there was a recall for some problem, and took it to the dealer to fix, would I have any right to complain if the dealer ran a check to ensure the vehicle wasn't stolen?

    I'm not a Microsoft fan, but why shouldn't the company verify that the user is running an authorized copy of Windows? I suppose if Microsoft is patching a hole that could cause other legitimate users problems (Blaster, etc.), they should allow unauthorized users to get that, but spyware/adware only hurts the user of that machine.

    It seems hypocritical to complain that Microsoft produces buggy software and then steal it and use it.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jan 18th, 2005 @ 10:20pm
  • MS the virtuous

    by aNonMooseCowherd

    It seems unlikely that Microsoft would actually stoop this low

    What tree have you been hiding under?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jan 19th, 2005 @ 8:59am
  • Not really, not yet.

    by Ed

    At the top of the original article you'll now find the following:

    Editor's note: This column is in error. The download site for Microsoft's anti-virus software strongly encourages users to run the company's validation software, but does not require it. SecurityFocus apologizes for the mistake

    This matches my experience when downloading the anti-spyware beta software. Although validating was encouraged, it was not mandatory.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Aug 2nd, 2005 @ 1:54pm
  • No Subject Given

    by Anonymous Coward

    Apparently there are a coupe of other workarounds to keep WGA at bay. Either you can paste “javascript:void(window.g_sDisableWGACheck=’all’) (no quotes) into the address bar of Internet Explorer before clicking the “Express” or “Custom” installs in the Automatic Update feature, or try opening IE, click Tools, Manage Addons, then select the ‘Addons that have been used by Internet Explorer’ option and disable the “Windows Product Advantage” addon. Both options have been tested and work, at least as of this post.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It