RSS
The Patent System Fights Back: Just Wants More Cash
from the nice-try dept
While more and more mainstream news organizations are pointing out the need for patent system reform, it appears those who support the current system are trying to fight back, by claiming that all the system needs is a little more money -- ignoring all the fundamental problems behind the patent system. The assumption is that, with a little more money, the USPTO could hire a few more patent examiners, and then, suddenly, they'd be able to search through "the complete record of the global human achievement to determine if any "prior art" would invalidate the claim." If the patent office can't figure out some of the most obvious cases of prior art, it's hard to see how a little more money is going to solve that. However, going even deeper, there's a fundamental disconnect here. The writer of the article defending the patent system states that without the current patent system, no innovation would occur in the US. This is (ahem!) patently false. It's already been shown that countries without patent systems can innovate rapidly and that innovation and invention are two very different beasts. The patent system protects invention -- but not innovation. In fact, with the rise of patent hoarding, the current patent system seems to be actively working against innovation. Dumping more money into the system for more of the same doesn't help matters. It just makes the mess more expensive.
I’m looking for research...
Geography Of The App Economy
Apps, Platforms, Consumer Use
I have a business...
The Future Of Commerce Will Combine Your Social Network And Mobile Device
Why 50,000 Monthly Active Users Weren't Enough To Stop This Company From Pivoting, With Spun Co-Founder Scott Lindenbaum
I’m looking for policy...
Policy Resources: Data Privacy & Security
Application Developers Alliance Applauds Schumer Plan To Introduce Patent Legislation
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
I've said it before...
The cost to a company for each patent filed should be increased for every invalid patent that is rejected. If you file only good, valid patents, then your cost never goes up. When you file a bunch of crappy patents that can be easily disputed (and perhaps the faster it's disputed the more the next patent should cost) then your price starts going up.
The USPTO could do like the old patent bounty site used to do and pay out monetary rewards to the first person/people submitting prior art to invalidate a patent.
This has a couple of distinct advantages, 1) the USPTO doesn't have to hire a bunch of new patent examiners - the entire US becomes the new patent examiners and 2) When a stupid, blatantly obvious patent gets approved, we have noone to blame but ourselves.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
why not use reviewers?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment