Fighting Spam By... Doing The Same Thing?
from the say-one-thing,-do-another dept
A panel discussion concerning how to stop spam at the Next Generation Networks conference started out by saying that the fight against spam had not been strategic enough. In other words, the responses weren't really targeted at the root of the problem. So, what's the more strategic solution? Actually, the suggestions given in the article sound exactly like what's already being done: filtering, tell people not to respond to spam and laws that punish spammers. How is that any more strategic? That sounds just as tactical.
2 Comments | Leave a Comment..
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Leaked Memo Confirms Apple, Nokia & RIM Gave Indian Gov't Backdoors
- VW Will Block BlackBerry Email When People Are Off Work. Isn't That When It's Most Useful?
- Former Tunisian Regime Goes Beyond Spying On Internet Traffic... To Rewriting Emails & More
- Email Is 40 Years Old
- New US Postal Service Ad Campaign: Email Sucks, So Mail Stuff Instead





Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
No Subject Given
Your privacy is extremely important to us. You are receiving this promotional message as a member of Permission! By continuing to receive emails from Permission! you agree to the Permission! Privacy Policy.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Doing the same thing... that spammers do
I wrote this about a year ago, thinking that flooding spammers' servers would make them think twice about exposing themselves. At least it's something different.
I let it go because I wasn't sure of the legal implications of promoting DDoS attacks. It's always easier for government to prosecute the good guys, rather than the bad guys. Good guys are so much easier to catch.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment