Quiet Period? We Don't Need No Stinking Quiet Period...

from the adversarial-period dept

Apparently, the SEC is finally thinking that it might be time to update their rules concerning the "quiet period" surrounding a company's IPO when they're not allowed to talk via much other than their prospectus. Red Herring's suggestion is to go somewhat to the other extreme, and exchange the quiet period for the adversarial period, where analysts and investors can quiz the company, and perhaps have all the questions and answers posted online so everyone can see them. Of course, this is (in theory) what the road show is supposed to be about, but that cuts out the "public" part.

1 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    No Subject Given

    identicon
    Nathan, Oct 21st, 2004 @ 7:19am

    If this cuts out the public, this will soon have companies following the same tactics we witness during Presidential debates, complete with an extra helping of 'spin' and 'soft' questions being lobbed by complicit analysts.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This