As if Diebold didn't have enough problems already, they've now lost a case to a bunch of students who were posting copies of the internal documents revealing that the company knew about the various security problems in their systems. Diebold responded not be dealing with the problems, but by going after the students under the DMCA, claiming that the documents were copyrighted material. Of course, amusingly, by doing so they provided proof that the documents were real and that Diebold did really know about the security problems, but just chose not to fix them. The EFF eventually sued Diebold to get them to stop sending out these bogus DMCA takedown notices -- and the judge seems to have agreed this was a violation, ruling clearly: "no reasonable copyright holder could have believed that portions of the e-mail archive discussing possible technical problems with Diebold's voting machines were protected by copyright." He also pointed out that Diebold, "knowingly materially misrepresented" the situation concerning those who posted the documents. Apparently, this is the first time a company has been found guilty of sending out bogus takedown notices, but sets a good precedent for others to fight back as well.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Feds Insist It Must Be Kept Secret Whether Or Not Plaintiff In No Fly List Trial Is Actually On The No Fly List
- Documents Show LA Sheriff's Department Hired Thieves, Statutory Rapists And Bad Cops
- Unarmed Man Charged With Assault Because NYC Police Shot At Him And Hit Random Pedestrians
- Judge In No Fly Case Explains To DOJ That It Can't Claim Publicly Released Info Is Secret
- German Court Says CEO Of Open Source Company Liable For 'Illegal' Functions Submitted By Community