Recording Industry Might Just Keep Webcast Royalties
from the don't-want-'em? dept
While the recording industry pushed so hard for compulsory licensing fees for radio webcasts and so hard against compulsory licensing for downloads (realizing, of course, they can sell downloads, but can't sell webcasts), it turns out that the fine print says that SoundExchange, the supposedly not-for-profit "affiliate" of the RIAA gets to keep any of the unclaimed royalties from the compulsory licenses. Seems like a pretty good deal for the RIAA. They collect the fees, and if no one steps up, they keep the fees. Whatever happened to all that talk about "doing what's best for the musicians?" It seems like you could make a bigger case that this is actual "theft" than downloading a song.






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
SoundExchange Collections
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: SoundExchange Collections
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: SoundExchange Collections
After ten minutes on both RIAA and BMI sites, i can find no mention of that, so maybe i was quite wrong.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: SoundExchange Collections
Final result: loads of extra income for the lawyer (or in this case the RIAA), and no laws broken. Nice system, huh? :-)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment